rustdoc: Fix hiding of private fields

The calculation for whether a field is public or private was tweaked in #13184,
but I forgot to update rustdoc.

Closes #13310
auto merge of #13319 : alexcrichton/rust/rustdoc-fields, r=brson

The calculation for whether a field is public or private was tweaked in #13184,
but I forgot to update rustdoc.

Closes #13310
syntax: Tweak parsing lifetime bounds on closures

In summary these are some example transitions this change makes:

    'a ||       => ||: 'a
    proc:Send() => proc():Send

The intended syntax for closures is to put the lifetime bound not at the front
but rather in the list of bounds. Currently there is no official support in the
AST for bounds that are not 'static, so this case is currently specially handled
in the parser to desugar to what the AST is expecting. Additionally, this moves
the bounds on procedures to the correct position, which is after the argument
list.

The current grammar for closures and procedures is:

    procedure := 'proc' [ '<' lifetime-list '>' ] '(' arg-list ')'
                        [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
    closure := [ 'unsafe' ] ['<' lifetime-list '>' ] '|' arg-list '|'
                        [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
    lifetime-list := lifetime | lifetime ',' lifetime-list
    arg-list := ident ':' type | ident ':' type ',' arg-list
    bound-list := bound | bound '+' bound-list
    bound := path | lifetime

This does not currently handle the << ambiguity in `Option<<'a>||>`, I am
deferring that to a later patch. Additionally, this removes the support for the
obsolete syntaxes of ~fn and &fn.

Closes #10553
Closes #10767
Closes #11209
Closes #11210
Closes #11211
auto merge of #13268 : alexcrichton/rust/parse-closure, r=cmr

In summary these are some example transitions this change makes:

    'a ||       => ||: 'a
    proc:Send() => proc():Send

The intended syntax for closures is to put the lifetime bound not at the front
but rather in the list of bounds. Currently there is no official support in the
AST for bounds that are not 'static, so this case is currently specially handled
in the parser to desugar to what the AST is expecting. Additionally, this moves
the bounds on procedures to the correct position, which is after the argument
list.

The current grammar for closures and procedures is:

    procedure := 'proc' [ '<' lifetime-list '>' ] '(' arg-list ')'
                        [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
    closure := [ 'unsafe' ] ['<' lifetime-list '>' ] '|' arg-list '|'
                        [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
    lifetime-list := lifetime | lifetime ',' lifetime-list
    arg-list := ident ':' type | ident ':' type ',' arg-list
    bound-list := bound | bound '+' bound-list
    bound := path | lifetime

This does not currently handle the << ambiguity in `Option<<'a>||>`, I am
deferring that to a later patch. Additionally, this removes the support for the
obsolete syntaxes of ~fn and &fn.

Closes #10553
Closes #10767 
Closes #11209
Closes #11210
Closes #11211
rustc: remove ty_unboxed_vec.