hrm, tbh I am -1 on that convention; but that's a personal choice


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Vibelli <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In model/api/pom.xml:
>
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> >          <dependency>
> >              <groupId>org.assertj</groupId>
> >              <artifactId>assertj-core</artifactId>
> > -            <version>1.5.0</version>
> > +            <version>${version.org.assertj.assertj-core}</version>
>
> I understand your point :-), I was just applying some conventions used by
> eap and integration platform (- A version property must be specified in the
> format "version.{groupId}", optionally with a suffix to make it unique.
>
>    - Version properties must be sorted alphabetically (other form of
>    sorting were found to be unclear and ambiguous)).
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/142/files#r10572642>
> .
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf