Add failing spec for savon issue #562
Bump rspec to 2.14
Convert specs to RSpec 2.14.7 syntax with Transpec

This conversion is done by Transpec 1.13.1 with the following command:
    transpec

* 57 conversions
    from: obj.should
      to: expect(obj).to

* 48 conversions
    from: == expected
      to: eq(expected)

* 28 conversions
    from: its(:attr) { }
      to: describe '#attr' do subject { super().attr }; it { } end

* 6 conversions
    from: it { should have(n).operations }
      to: it 'has n operations' do expect(subject.operations.size).to eq(n) end

* 2 conversions
    from: =~ [1, 2]
      to: match_array([1, 2])

* 2 conversions
    from: obj.should_receive(:message)
      to: expect(obj).to receive(:message)

* 1 conversion
    from: lambda { }.should
      to: expect { }.to

* 1 conversion
    from: obj.should_not
      to: expect(obj).not_to
Add transpec as a dev dependency
Add ruby 2.1 to travis matrix
Remove transpec
Merge branch 'pr/46'

Closes #46
Make tests in PR #46 pass

There's a lot of convoluted logic going on in Wasabi for determining the
"correct name" for an operation. Around this time in 2013, a change in PR #15
that made the parser fall back to the port message's message attribute.

I searched around in the W3 spec for where this is the correct behavior and all
I could find was hints that the operation name should always be used.

Unsure if and or when this will ever be determined correctly, but this seems
to be a step in the right direction.