Ah, ok good. Perhaps obscure it so there are no questions? We can also make
it 1 , 2, 3 or something.


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Alison Hodges <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In docs/en_us/course_authors/source/running_course/course_grades.rst:
>
> > +   Below the chart, subsections are listed on the left and the units that contain assignments are listed on the right. The student's individual problem scores display.
> > +
> > +.. image:: ../Images/Student_Progress_
> list.png
> > +     :alt: Bottom portion of a Progress page for the same student with the score acheived for each problem in the first course subsection
> > +
> > +=============================================
> > +Interpret the Student Progress Page
> > +=============================================
> > +
> > +The chart of a student's scores on the **Progress** page and the rows of data on the grade report present assignment scores in a similar order. However, the total, cumulative score earned for the course is placed in a different position on the **Progress** page.
> > +
> > +In this example grade report, the indicated student has a current grade of 0.43 (43%).
> > +
> > +.. image:: ../Images/Grade_Report_example.png
> > +  :alt: A course grade report with a single student's information indicated by a rectangle
> > +
>
> It is not real student data. Should I obscure it anyway?
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/edx/edx-platform/pull/3287/files#r11499546>
> .
>