I did notice this and I'm pretty ambivalent about this - it really depends
on what these are. If they are just a form of coded keywords then yes, they
should, indeed be tags and not in the extra field. I see little downside in
adding tags from multiple fields.


On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Aurimas Vinckevicius <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In zbMATH.js:
>
> > +						"title": "Snapshot"
> > +					}
> > +				],
> > +				"itemID": "zbMATH06115874",
> > +				"title": "Sharp threshold for the appearance of certain spanning trees in random graphs",
> > +				"publicationTitle": "Random Structures & Algorithms",
> > +				"journalAbbreviation": "Random Struct. Algorithms",
> > +				"ISSN": "1042-9832; 1098-2418/e",
> > +				"volume": "41",
> > +				"issue": "4",
> > +				"pages": "391-412",
> > +				"date": "2012",
> > +				"publisher": "John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY",
> > +				"language": "English",
> > +				"DOI": "10.1002/rsa.20472",
> > +				"extra": "MSC2010: 05C05 = Trees\nMSC2010: 05C80 = Random graphs",
>
> Sorry I haven't provided any input after you changed this (been occupied
> with personal stuff), but I'm not too excited about storing things like his
> in Extra. That field is not exactly well defined, so I won't fight it too
> much, but IMO this would work much better as tags.
>
> Not sure if @adam3smith <https://github.com/adam3smith> noticed this, but
> if he did and approves, then I'll back away.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/zotero/translators/pull/684/files#r10417668>
> .
>



-- 
Sebastian Karcher
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Political Science
Northwestern University