Ah oops.  Sorry, its  ? if its the first parameter in the url, its an
ampersand if its going after a bunch of other stuff.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Alex Jordan <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In lib/WeBWorK/ContentGenerator/Problem.pm:
>
> > @@ -580,11 +629,13 @@ sub pre_header_initialize {
> >  	##### form processing #####
> >  	
> >  	# set options from form fields (see comment at top of file for names)
> > -	my $displayMode        = $r->param("displayMode") || $ce->{pg}->{options}->{displayMode};
> > -	my $redisplay          = $r->param("redisplay");
> > -	my $submitAnswers      = $r->param("submitAnswers");
> > -	my $checkAnswers       = $r->param("checkAnswers");
> > -	my $previewAnswers     = $r->param("previewAnswers");
> > +	my $displayMode               = $r->param("displayMode") || $ce->{pg}->{options}->{displayMode};
> > +	my $redisplay                 = $r->param("redisplay");
> > +	my $submitAnswers             = $r->param("submitAnswers");
> > +	my $checkAnswers              = $r->param("checkAnswers");
> > +	my $showMeAnother             = $r->param("showMeAnother");
>
> It took me a minute to figure this out, but it's an ampersand (not a
> question mark) at the beginning of that string. I can confirm the same
> behavior. Additionally, the SMA message "You are currently checking answers
> to a different version of your problem..." appears, but it is the original
> version. While we clearly need to prevent this particular doorway, this
> makes me wonder if we have the right checks in place for showing that
> message in other situations.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/openwebwork/webwork2/pull/342/files#r12215054>
> .
>