reformatting begins

OK, lets see if I did this right.  
Are you sure?  I don't think we want to remove opportunities for user overloading of operators. But I'm on my phone at the moment so I may be missing context on why they should go

Brad

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 2, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Albert-Jan Nijburg <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> In src/abstract.js:
> 
> > +        case "RShift":
> > +            return obj.nb$rshift ? obj.nb$rshift : obj['__rshift__'];
> > +        case "BitAnd":
> > +            return obj.nb$and ? obj.nb$and : obj['__and__'];
> > +        case "BitXor":
> > +            return obj.nb$xor ? obj.nb$xor : obj['__xor__'];
> > +        case "BitOr":
> > +            return obj.nb$or ? obj.nb$or : obj['__or__'];
> > +    }
> > +};
> > +
> > +Sk.abstr.boNameToSlotFuncRhs_ = function (obj, name) {
> > +    if (obj === null) {
> > +        return undefined;
> > +    }
> > +    ;
> These can be removed
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.