rhbz1110627 zanata init

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110627
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038852

Depends on https://github.com/zanata/zanata-api/pull/15 and https://github.com/zanata/zanata-server/pull/520
We won't lose anything for now. But if we ever have specific options in init, we will need this class. It will make our life easier having this class now. It also make the code easier to read. 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "David Mason" <notifications@github.com>
> To: "zanata/zanata-client" <zanata-client@noreply.github.com>
> Cc: "Patrick Huang" <pahuang@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:04:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [zanata-client] rhbz1110627 zanata init (#27)

> In
> zanata-client-commands/src/main/java/org/zanata/client/commands/init/InitOptions.java:
> > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > +package org.zanata.client.commands.init;
> > +
> > +import org.zanata.client.commands.ConfigurableProjectOptions;
> > +
> > +public interface InitOptions extends ConfigurableProjectOptions {
> > +}

> Would we lose something if we just used the ConfigurableProjectOptions
> interface for the options implementation to init command?

> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .