Added webResourcesValidators extension point. fixes #14

This fixes #14 

Take a look at the adopter side of this extension point here: https://github.com/gamerson/liferay-ide/commit/b6503ad4e50b015c0f0d4b16b123a4246d914da1
Ok that makes sense, I'll update the names to use this new naming and
resend the commit.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Angelo <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In
> org.eclipse.a.wst.html.webresources.core/src/org/eclipse/wst/html/webresources/core/validation/IWebResourcesValidator.java:
>
> > + *  Copyright (c) 2014 Liferay, Inc.
> > + *  All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
> > + *  are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
> > + *  which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
> > + *  http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
> > + *
> > + *  Contributors:
> > + *      Gregory Amerson <gregory.amerson@liferay.com> - initial API and implementation
> > + */
> > +package org.eclipse.wst.html.webresources.core.validation;
> > +
> > +import org.eclipse.wst.html.webresources.core.providers.IWebResourcesContext;
> > +import org.eclipse.wst.html.webresources.core.providers.WebResourceKind;
> > +
> > +
> > +public interface IWebResourcesValidator {
>
> With IWebResourcesValidator name, you expect to have some validation,
> although it is used just to ignore validation. If tell me if we have other
> features for validation, we could create an new interface API. That's why I
> think IWebResourcesIgnoreValidator is better. This API follows the same
> idea than the future WTP ignore element/attribute validator
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18387
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/angelozerr/eclipse-wtp-webresources/pull/19/files#r18504139>
> .
>



-- 
Greg Amerson
Liferay Developer Tools
Liferay, Inc. www.liferay.com