restore files dropped in official update
ARM: dma-mapping: introduce DMA_ERROR_CODE constant

Replace all uses of ~0 with DMA_ERROR_CODE, what should make the code
easier to read.

Change-Id: I6c0fff904d8df3a9d2a8a727e62faf000a55c1b5
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-By: Subash Patel <subash.ramaswamy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
ARM: dma-mapping: remove offset parameter to prepare for generic dma_ops

This patch removes the need for the offset parameter in dma bounce
functions. This is required to let dma-mapping framework on ARM
architecture to use common, generic dma_map_ops based dma-mapping
helpers.

Background and more detailed explaination:

dma_*_range_* functions are available from the early days of the dma
mapping api. They are the correct way of doing a partial syncs on the
buffer (usually used by the network device drivers). This patch changes
only the internal implementation of the dma bounce functions to let
them tunnel through dma_map_ops structure. The driver api stays
unchanged, so driver are obliged to call dma_*_range_* functions to
keep code clean and easy to understand.

The only drawback from this patch is reduced detection of the dma api
abuse. Let us consider the following code:

dma_addr = dma_map_single(dev, ptr, 64, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(dev, dma_addr+16, 0, 32, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

Without the patch such code fails, because dma bounce code is unable
to find the bounce buffer for the given dma_address. After the patch
the above sync call will be equivalent to:

dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(dev, dma_addr, 16, 32, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

which succeeds.

I don't consider this as a real problem, because DMA API abuse should be
caught by debug_dma_* function family. This patch lets us to simplify
the internal low-level implementation without chaning the driver visible
API.

Change-Id: I9a847e30f345bf5e69fded1747ff79057750fb66
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-By: Subash Patel <subash.ramaswamy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
msm: audio: Use adsp as a string param for pil_get function for 8974

For 8974 target, pil_get function uses "adsp" string as a param, for
other targets it uses "q6", for pil_get to succeed, we need to try
with both strings before we return an error.

Change-Id: Ia1e05f9ce4d9f09165bdfbd1c68cad9136d62b0f
Signed-off-by: Harmandeep Singh <hsingh@codeaurora.org>
msm: APRv2: Add APRv2 support

The MSM platforms that turn off LPASS core by default have to bring up
LPASS core prior to talk with it.
Current implementation is during bootup, before the slimbus slave device
is up, the slimbus master on apps would try to configure the slimbus
hardware.
Add APRv2 driver to let adsp loader to bring up LPASS core on and make
slimbus driver to configure hardware after bringing up LPASS core.

Change-Id: I9c45e229e6e4c5c142d8a327509d66d9662b52d4
Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
msm: apr: initialize subsystem device state early

The current APR driver initializes subsystem state from late_init so
slimbus driver reads ADSP's state too late.
Move initialization code to apr_init so that slimbus driver can be
probe sooner.

Change-Id: I14d1bf294b40dd7ea184923ba023646e05912fff
Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
(cherry picked from commit ddc46df62d97108de1e45f57b29bc44a4ead0787)
ASoC: apq8064-i2s: Add machine driver for APQ8064 I2S.

This machine driver implements the topology which voice
downlink/uplink streams from/to MDM are received via primary
spkr/mic I2S interfaces and internally loop back within LPASS
to MI2S interface with the other end connected to wcd9310
CODEC.

Signed-off-by: Kuirong Wang <kuirongw@codeaurora.org>
(cherry picked from commit 80f8ec49294e9698751a5afd8c33fb327f8f5b6a)
(cherry picked from commit bf8f93bc69fb3e6a7333525249984212271ca3ad)

Change-Id: I2d9140c49d14f172ae402d738ab3b6b523250486
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Sharma <sudsha@codeaurora.org>
freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip()

commit dd67d32dbc5de299d70cc9e10c6c1e29ffa56b92 upstream.

A task is considered frozen enough between freezer_do_not_count() and
freezer_count() and freezers use freezer_should_skip() to test this
condition.  This supposedly works because freezer_count() always calls
try_to_freezer() after clearing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP.

However, there currently is nothing which guarantees that
freezer_count() sees %true freezing() after clearing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP
when freezing is in progress, and vice-versa.  A task can escape the
freezing condition in effect by freezer_count() seeing !freezing() and
freezer_should_skip() seeing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP.

This patch adds smp_mb()'s to freezer_count() and
freezer_should_skip() such that either %true freezing() is visible to
freezer_count() or !PF_FREEZER_SKIP is visible to
freezer_should_skip().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "freezer: comment out might_sleep()"

This reverts commit 6cdb09deefb68b9eaeb63ec052103c366fa9e5dc.
ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL

putreg() assumes that the tracee is not running and pt_regs_access() can
safely play with its stack.  However a killed tracee can return from
ptrace_stop() to the low-level asm code and do RESTORE_REST, this means
that debugger can actually read/modify the kernel stack until the tracee
does SAVE_REST again.

set_task_blockstep() can race with SIGKILL too and in some sense this
race is even worse, the very fact the tracee can be woken up breaks the
logic.

As Linus suggested we can clear TASK_WAKEKILL around the arch_ptrace()
call, this ensures that nobody can ever wakeup the tracee while the
debugger looks at it.  Not only this fixes the mentioned problems, we
can do some cleanups/simplifications in arch_ptrace() paths.

Probably ptrace_unfreeze_traced() needs more callers, for example it
makes sense to make the tracee killable for oom-killer before
access_process_vm().

While at it, add the comment into may_ptrace_stop() to explain why
ptrace_stop() still can't rely on SIGKILL and signal_pending_state().

Reported-by: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>
Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/x86/kernel/step.c

Conflicts:
	kernel/signal.c
signal: always clear sa_restorer on execve

When the new signal handlers are set up, the location of sa_restorer is
not cleared, leaking a parent process's address space location to
children.  This allows for a potential bypass of the parent's ASLR by
examining the sa_restorer value returned when calling sigaction().

Based on what should be considered "secret" about addresses, it only
matters across the exec not the fork (since the VMAs haven't changed
until the exec).  But since exec sets SIG_DFL and keeps sa_restorer,
this is where it should be fixed.

Given the few uses of sa_restorer, a "set" function was not written
since this would be the only use.  Instead, we use
__ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER, as already done in other places.

Example of the leak before applying this patch:

  $ cat /proc/$$/maps
  ...
  7fb9f3083000-7fb9f3238000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 404469 .../libc-2.15.so
  ...
  $ ./leak
  ...
  7f278bc74000-7f278be29000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 404469 .../libc-2.15.so
  ...
  1 0 (nil) 0x7fb9f30b94a0
  2 4000000 (nil) 0x7f278bcaa4a0
  3 4000000 (nil) 0x7f278bcaa4a0
  4 0 (nil) 0x7fb9f30b94a0
  ...

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use SA_RESTORER for backportability]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
Cc: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
HACK: ARM: disable sleeping while atomic warning in do_signal

ARM disables interrupts in do_signal, which triggers a warning in
try_to_freeze, see details at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/23/221.
To prevent the warnings, add try_to_freeze_nowarn and call it from
do_signal.

Change-Id: If7482de21c386adc705fa1ac4ecb8c7ece5bb356
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
sigtimedwait: use freezable blocking call

Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in a sigtimedwait call during
suspend and resume by calling a freezable blocking call.  Previous
patches modified the freezer to avoid sending wakeups to threads
that are blocked in freezable blocking calls.

This call was selected to be converted to a freezable call because
it doesn't hold any locks or release any resources when interrupted
that might be needed by another freezing task or a kernel driver
during suspend, and is a common site where idle userspace tasks are
blocked.

Change-Id: Ic27469b60a67d50cdc0d0c78975951a99c25adcd
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freezer: add unsafe versions of freezable helpers for NFS

NFS calls the freezable helpers with locks held, which is unsafe
and will cause lockdep warnings when 6aa9707 "lockdep: check
that no locks held at freeze time" is reapplied (it was reverted
in dbf520a).  NFS shouldn't be doing this, but it has
long-running syscalls that must hold a lock but also shouldn't
block suspend.  Until NFS freeze handling is rewritten to use a
signal to exit out of the critical section, add new *_unsafe
versions of the helpers that will not run the lockdep test when
6aa9707 is reapplied, and call them from NFS.

In practice the likley result of holding the lock while freezing
is that a second task blocked on the lock will never freeze,
aborting suspend, but it is possible to manufacture a case using
the cgroup freezer, the lock, and the suspend freezer to create
a deadlock.  Silencing the lockdep warning here will allow
problems to be found in other drivers that may have a more
serious deadlock risk, and prevent new problems from being added.

Change-Id: Ia17d32cdd013a6517bdd5759da900970a4427170
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freezer: add unsafe versions of freezable helpers for CIFS

CIFS calls wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe with a VFS lock held,
which is unsafe and will cause lockdep warnings when 6aa9707
"lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time" is reapplied
(it was reverted in dbf520a).  CIFS shouldn't be doing this, but
it has long-running syscalls that must hold a lock but also
shouldn't block suspend.  Until CIFS freeze handling is rewritten
to use a signal to exit out of the critical section, add a new
wait_event_freezekillable_unsafe helper that will not run the
lockdep test when 6aa9707 is reapplied, and call it from CIFS.

In practice the likley result of holding the lock while freezing
is that a second task blocked on the lock will never freeze,
aborting suspend, but it is possible to manufacture a case using
the cgroup freezer, the lock, and the suspend freezer to create
a deadlock.  Silencing the lockdep warning here will allow
problems to be found in other drivers that may have a more
serious deadlock risk, and prevent new problems from being added.

Change-Id: I420c5392bacf68e58e268293b2b36068ad4df753
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time

We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held.  Holding a lock can cause a
deadlock if the lock is later acquired in the suspend or hibernate path
(e.g.  by dpm).  Holding a lock can also cause a deadlock in the case of
cgroup_freezer if a lock is held inside a frozen cgroup that is later
acquired by a process outside that group.

History:
This patch was originally applied as 6aa9707099c and reverted in
dbf520a9d7d4 because NFS was freezing with locks held.  It was
deemed better to keep the bad freeze point in NFS to allow laptops
to suspend consistently.  The previous patch in this series converts
NFS to call _unsafe versions of the freezable helpers so that
lockdep doesn't complain about them until a more correct fix
can be applied.

Change-Id: Ib9d4299fb75a39e611b868be42e413909a994baa
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: export debug_check_no_locks_held]
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freezer: convert freezable helpers to freezer_do_not_count()

Freezing tasks will wake up almost every userspace task from
where it is blocking and force it to run until it hits a
call to try_to_sleep(), generally on the exit path from the syscall
it is blocking in.  On resume each task will run again, usually
restarting the syscall and running until it hits the same
blocking call as it was originally blocked in.

Convert the existing wait_event_freezable* wrappers to use
freezer_do_not_count().  Combined with a previous patch,
these tasks will not run during suspend or resume unless they wake
up for another reason, in which case they will run until they hit
the try_to_freeze() in freezer_count(), and then continue processing
the wakeup after tasks are thawed.

This results in a small change in behavior, previously a race
between freezing and a normal wakeup would be won by the wakeup,
now the task will freeze and then handle the wakeup after thawing.

Change-Id: I532e62251f58c1a9ca488b3fb6220c53acf7d33d
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freezer: convert freezable helpers to static inline where possible

Some of the freezable helpers have to be macros because their
condition argument needs to get evaluated every time through
the wait loop.  Convert the others to static inline to make
future changes easier.

Change-Id: I69d3fc10d26522cb9bf3a616ff4f21245f9c071a
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
freezer: add new freezable helpers using freezer_do_not_count()

Freezing tasks will wake up almost every userspace task from
where it is blocking and force it to run until it hits a
call to try_to_sleep(), generally on the exit path from the syscall
it is blocking in.  On resume each task will run again, usually
restarting the syscall and running until it hits the same
blocking call as it was originally blocked in.

To allow tasks to avoid running on every suspend/resume cycle,
this patch adds additional freezable wrappers around blocking calls
that call freezer_do_not_count().  Combined with the previous patch,
these tasks will not run during suspend or resume unless they wake
up for another reason, in which case they will run until they hit
the try_to_freeze() in freezer_count(), and then continue processing
the wakeup after tasks are thawed.

Additional patches will convert the most common locations that
userspace blocks in to use freezable helpers.

Change-Id: Id909760ce460f2532801a4b00d344f0816bfefc9
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
lockdep: remove task argument from debug_check_no_locks_held

The only existing caller to debug_check_no_locks_held calls it
with 'current' as the task, and the freezer needs to call
debug_check_no_locks_held but doesn't already have a current
task pointer, so remove the argument.  It is already assuming
that the current task is relevant by dumping the current stack
trace as part of the warning.

This was originally part of 6aa9707099c (lockdep: check that
no locks held at freeze time) which was reverted in
dbf520a9d7d4.

Change-Id: Idbaf1332ce6c80dc49c1d31c324c7fbf210657c5
Original-author: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>