acpu: Write WildSetup clk tbl

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock-8x60.c
hercules: update defconfig
mm: ashmem: fix deadlock when system is low on memory When system is low on memory, allocating memory while holding the ashmem_mutex may try to directly reclaim memory. Then ashmem_shrink() is called in same thread. It will deadlock at acquiring ashmem_mutex. This change lets ashmem_shrink() return failure if ashmem_mutex is not available. Memory will be reclaimed from others.

Change-Id: I3b6024d5477d37245f4ebde6d7069fb77af789ee
Signed-off-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <yuanyuan.zhong@gmail.com>
mmc: core: Fix possbile memory leak Fix possible memory leak detected by kmemleak:

unreferenced object 0xc0f80f00 (size 64):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294937508 (age 82.980s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    6d 6d 63 30 5f 64 65 74 65 63 74 00 72 79 2e 68  mmc0_detect.ry.h
    00 07 00 00 68 77 63 61 70 2e 68 00 02 00 00 70  ....hwcap.h....p
  backtrace:
    [<c010a1fc>] __kmalloc+0x164/0x220
    [<c01e1630>] kvasprintf+0x38/0x58
    [<c01e1668>] kasprintf+0x18/0x24
    [<c02fcf60>] mmc_alloc_host+0x114/0x1b4
    [<c0311c84>] msmsdcc_probe+0xc14/0x1fd8
    [<c022b40c>] platform_drv_probe+0x14/0x18
    [<c022a144>] driver_probe_device+0x144/0x334
    [<c022a394>] __driver_attach+0x60/0x84
    [<c022884c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x4c/0x78
    [<c0229720>] bus_add_driver+0xd0/0x250
    [<c022a884>] driver_register+0x9c/0x128
    [<c00086bc>] do_one_initcall+0x90/0x160
    [<c06d1904>] kernel_init+0xe8/0x1a4
    [<c000ee4c>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8
    [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

Change-Id: I3b29d71463af849a072cabbe56637adf6db6d0da
Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations Changelog since V1 o Update changelog with more detail o Add comment on __GFP_NO_KSWAPD

Occasionally during large file copies to slow storage, there are still
reports of user-visible stalls when THP is enabled. Reports on this
have been intermittent and not reliable to reproduce locally but;

Andy Isaacson reported a problem copying to VFAT on SD Card
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/7/2

	In this case, it was stuck in munmap for betwen 20 and 60
	seconds in compaction. It is also possible that khugepaged
	was holding mmap_sem on this process if CONFIG_NUMA was set.

Johannes Weiner reported stalls on USB
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/25/378

	In this case, there is no stack trace but it looks like the
	same problem. The USB stick may have been using NTFS as a
	filesystem based on other work done related to writing back
	to USB around the same time.

Internally in SUSE, I received a bug report related to stalls in firefox
	when using Java and Flash heavily while copying from NFS
	to VFAT on USB. It has not been confirmed to be the same problem
	but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck.....

In the past, commit [11bc82d6: mm: compaction: Use async migration for
__GFP_NO_KSWAPD and enforce no writeback] forced that sync compaction
would never be used for THP allocations. This was reverted in commit
[c6a140bf: mm/compaction: reverse the change that forbade sync
migraton with __GFP_NO_KSWAPD] on the grounds that it was uncertain
it was beneficial.

While user-visible stalls do not happen for me when writing to USB,
I setup a test running postmark while short-lived processes created
anonymous mapping. The objective was to exercise the paths that
allocate transparent huge pages. I then logged when processes were
stalled for more than 1 second, recorded a stack strace and did some
analysis to aggregate unique "stall events" which revealed

Time stalled in this event:    47369 ms
Event count:                      20
usemem               sleep_on_page          3690 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          2148 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1534 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1518 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1225 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          2205 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          2399 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          2398 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          3760 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1861 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          2948 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1515 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1386 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1882 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1850 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          3715 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          3716 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          4846 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1306 ms
usemem               sleep_on_page          1467 ms
[<ffffffff810ef30c>] wait_on_page_bit+0x6c/0x80
[<ffffffff8113de9f>] unmap_and_move+0x1bf/0x360
[<ffffffff8113e0e2>] migrate_pages+0xa2/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81134273>] compact_zone+0x1f3/0x2f0
[<ffffffff811345d8>] compact_zone_order+0xa8/0xf0
[<ffffffff811346ff>] try_to_compact_pages+0xdf/0x110
[<ffffffff810f773a>] __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xda/0x1a0
[<ffffffff810f7d5d>] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x55d/0x7a0
[<ffffffff810f8151>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1b1/0x1c0
[<ffffffff811331db>] alloc_pages_vma+0x9b/0x160
[<ffffffff81142bb0>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x160/0x270
[<ffffffff814410a7>] do_page_fault+0x207/0x4c0
[<ffffffff8143dde5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30

The stall times are approximate at best but the estimates represent 25%
of the worst stalls and even if the estimates are off by a factor of
10, it's severe.

This patch once again prevents sync migration for transparent
hugepage allocations as it is preferable to fail a THP allocation
than stall.

It was suggested that __GFP_NORETRY be used instead of __GFP_NO_KSWAPD
to look less like a special case. This would prevent THP allocation
using sync compaction but it would have other side-effects. There are
existing users of __GFP_NORETRY that are doing high-order allocations
and while they can handle allocation failure, it seems reasonable that
they continue to use sync compaction unless there is a deliberate
reason to change that. To help clarify this for the future, this
patch updates the comment for __GFP_NO_KSWAPD.

If accepted, this is a -stable candidate.

Reported-by: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
mm/vmscan.c: avoid possible deadlock caused by too_many_isolated() Neil found that if too_many_isolated() returns true while performing direct reclaim we can end up waiting for other threads to complete their direct reclaim. If those threads are allowed to enter the FS or IO to free memory, but this thread is not, then it is possible that those threads will be waiting on this thread and so we get a circular deadlock.

some task enters direct reclaim with GFP_KERNEL
  => too_many_isolated() false
    => vmscan and run into dirty pages
      => pageout()
        => take some FS lock
          => fs/block code does GFP_NOIO allocation
            => enter direct reclaim again
              => too_many_isolated() true
                => waiting for others to progress, however the other
                   tasks may be circular waiting for the FS lock..

The fix is to let !__GFP_IO and !__GFP_FS direct reclaims enjoy higher
priority than normal ones, by lowering the throttle threshold for the
latter.

Allowing ~1/8 isolated pages in normal is large enough.  For example, for
a 1GB LRU list, that's ~128MB isolated pages, or 1k blocked tasks (each
isolates 32 4KB pages), or 64 blocked tasks per logical CPU (assuming 16
logical CPUs per NUMA node).  So it's not likely some CPU goes idle
waiting (when it could make progress) because of this limit: there are
much more sleeping reclaim tasks than the number of CPU, so the task may
well be blocked by some low level queue/lock anyway.

Now !GFP_IOFS reclaims won't be waiting for GFP_IOFS reclaims to progress.
 They will be blocked only when there are too many concurrent !GFP_IOFS
reclaims, however that's very unlikely because the IO-less direct reclaims
is able to progress much more faster, and they won't deadlock each other.
The threshold is raised high enough for them, so that there can be
sufficient parallel progress of !GFP_IOFS reclaims.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment]
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
timer.c: Optimise apply_slack() for size and speed.

http://lkml.indianaedu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.3/03172.html

To apply proper slack, the original algorithm used to prepare a mask and
then apply the mask to obtain the appropriately rounded-off absolute
time the timer expires.

This patch modifies the masking logic to a bit-shift logic, therby
reducing the complexity and number of operations. Thus obtaining a minor
speed-up.
irq: Set CPU affinity as soon as the irq thread is created
In an embedded target where IRQ affinities are pre-configured during boot-time (and not modified through /proc/irq/../smp_affinity) during run-time, the extra latency due to irq_thread_check_affinity can be avoided during processing of the first interrupt with this patch.

backported from Linux 3.5+ by faux123
mm: Correct writeback tweak when screen ON
[PATCH] mutex: dynamically disable mutex spinning at high load Date
 Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:54:18 -0400

The Linux mutex code has a MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER configuration
option that was enabled by default in major distributions like Red
Hat. Allowing threads waiting on mutex to spin while the mutex owner
is running will theoretically reduce latency on the acquisition of
mutex at the expense of energy efficiency as the spinning threads
are doing no useful work.

This is not a problem on a lightly loaded system where the CPU may
be idle anyway. On a highly loaded system, the spinning tasks may be
blocking other tasks from running even if they have higher priority
because the spinning was done with preemption disabled.

This patch will disable mutex spinning if the current load is high
enough. The load is considered high if there are 2 or more active tasks
waiting to run on the current CPU. If there is only one task waiting,
it will check the average load at the past minute (calc_load_tasks).
If it is more than double the number of active CPUs, the load is
considered high too.  This is a rather simple metric that does not
incur that much additional overhead.

The AIM7 benchmarks were run on 3.7.10 derived kernels to show the
performance changes with this patch on a 8-socket 80-core system
with hyperthreading off.  The table below shows the mean % change
in performance over a range of users for some AIM7 workloads with
just the less atomic operation patch (patch 1) vs the less atomic
operation patch plus this one (patches 1+3).

+--------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
|   Workload   | mean % change   | mean % change   | mean % change   |
|              | 10-100 users    | 200-1000 users  | 1100-2000 users |
+--------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| alltests     |      0.0%       |     -0.1%       |    +5.0%        |
| five_sec     |     +1.5%       |     +1.3%       |    +1.3%        |
| fserver      |     +1.5%       |    +25.4%       |    +9.6%        |
| high_systime |     +0.1%       |      0.0%       |    +0.8%        |
| new_fserver  |     +0.2%       |    +11.9%       |   +14.1%        |
| shared       |     -1.2%       |     +0.3%       |    +1.8%        |
| short        |     +6.4%       |     +2.5%       |    +3.0%        |
+--------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
It can be seen that this patch provides some big performance
improvement for the fserver and new_fserver workloads while is still
generally positive for the other AIM7 workloads.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
modified for tuna kernel from LKML

Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
GPU: Alter bus values

Add new low/high to conserve battery when possible and maintain performance
acpuclock: Lower a few more voltages

I've been running my undervoltage set for about 12 days now with
full stability. So it's pretty safe to say that they are safe enough to use
which is a good sign as my device no longer heats up during moderate/heavy
use as it did in previous voltage tables. I will be using this setup here on
out as they've proven beneficial.

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock-8x60.c
GPU: dont OC by default, allow SYSFS contol over max clock
msm: kgsl: Add new low/high power gpu clock rates more efficient battery consumption
acpuclock: Never too many voltage changes
tmp