Add support for git repositories in the 'includes' directive.

# Git support for the includes directive

## Objective
Being able to retrieve makefiles from git repositories

## The reason
In our company we work with multiple makefiles for the hundreds of different projects that we have and manage with different build scripts, and we are currently working on a better way to organise our several dozens of makefiles. One approach that we've found to be very practical for us, is the following _example_ structure:

````
api = 2
core = 7.x

; platform.make contains core drupal and several main modules/themes/libraries
; that we need to have available for all of our projects
includes[platform] = "platform.make"

; sub_platform.make contains specific modules/themes/libraries for
; specific requirements on a different set of projects
includes[subplatform] = "sub_platform.make"

; [...]
```

## The problem
The only problem with this setup is that our makefiles are distributed in several *private* git repositories (divide and conquer: this way we can have better control on what project/patches are inside on the different types of platforms) so getting the makefiles from raw urls is off the table since it will need some kind of authentication, and we're not going to do write nasty stuff to make that happen.

## The solution
The 'includes' directive supports git repositories. This way, we get to assemble the main makefile the way we need it (also we get to define the core directive in the remote makefile that we want, and not the main one, giving us more control on Drupal versions).

## Code proposal
With this code, drush make will support the following sentences in the makefiles:

```
includes[remote][makefile] = 'drupal.make'
includes[remote][download][type] = "git"
includes[remote][download][url] = "git@github.com:organisation/repository.git"
; branch could also be tag or revision, code relays on make_download_git function
includes[remote][download][branch] = "7.x"
```

Also, despite our reasons of needing this feature, it seems like a natural feature that 'includes' could use, since it currently supports local files, relative path local files and remote urls.

## Final thoughts 
The idea is to meet the requirement *without* going against the community standards, so if you think that we can achieve the same with another approach, or you have a different approach for the submitted code in this PR, please let me know.

Thanks!