Add `extra::getopts::short_usage`

This complements `usage` by auto-generating a short one-liner summary
of the options.
stop calling `exchange_free` on 0-size types

A solid step towards fixing #11998. Eventually, the size may always be
passed to `exchange_free` but this will not be required to fix the bug.
auto merge of #12045 : thestinger/rust/glue, r=pcwalton

A solid step towards fixing #11998. Eventually, the size may always be
passed to `exchange_free` but this will not be required to fix the bug.
move concurrent stuff from libextra to libsync
auto merge of #11939 : JeremyLetang/rust/move-libsync, r=alexcrichton

This time everything should be okay, No break due to a failed merge or rebase...

Sorry for the abuse of pull request.

So this move extra::sync, extra::arc, extra::future, extra::comm and extra::task_pool to libsync.
pull extra::{serialize, ebml} into a separate libserialize crate

- `extra::json` didn't make the cut, because of `extra::json` required
   dep on `extra::TreeMap`. If/when `extra::TreeMap` moves out of `extra`,
   then `extra::json` could move into `serialize`
- `libextra`, `libsyntax` and `librustc` depend on the newly created
  `libserialize`
- The extensions to various `extra` types like `DList`, `RingBuf`, `TreeMap`
  and `TreeSet` for `Encodable`/`Decodable` were moved into the respective
  modules in `extra`
- There is some trickery, evident in `src/libextra/lib.rs` where a stub
  of `extra::serialize` is set up (in `src/libextra/serialize.rs`) for
  use in the stage0 build, where the snapshot rustc is still making
  deriving for `Encodable` and `Decodable` point at extra. Big props to
  @huonw for help working out the re-export solution for this

extra: inline extra::serialize stub

fix stuff clobbered in rebase + don't reexport serialize::serialize

no more globs in libserialize

syntax: fix import of libserialize traits

librustc: fix bad imports in encoder/decoder

add serialize dep to librustdoc

fix failing run-pass tests w/ serialize dep

adjust uuid dep

more rebase de-clobbering for libserialize

fixing tests, pushing libextra dep into cfg(test)

fix doc code in extra::json

adjust index.md links to serialize and uuid library
auto merge of #11984 : olsonjeffery/rust/libserialize, r=alexcrichton

- `extra::json` didn't make the cut, because of `extra::json`'s required
   dep on `extra::TreeMap`. If/when `extra::TreeMap` moves out of `extra`,
   then `extra::json` could move into `libserialize`
- `libextra`, `libsyntax` and `librustc` depend on the newly created
  `libserialize`
- The extensions to various `extra` types like `DList`, `RingBuf`, `TreeMap`
  and `TreeSet` for `Encodable`/`Decodable` were moved into the respective
  modules in `extra`
- There is some trickery, evident in `src/libextra/lib.rs` where a stub
  of `extra::serialize` is set up (in `src/libextra/serialize.rs`) for
  use in the stage0 build, where the snapshot rustc is still making
  deriving for `Encodable` and `Decodable` point at extra. Big props to
  @huonw for help working out the re-export solution for this
- @pcwalton's change in 449a7a8 didn't sneak back in
etc/tidy: don't check SNAP against triple
etc: add missing license boilerplates
rustdoc: update deps
Implement clone() for TCP/UDP/Unix sockets

This is part of the overall strategy I would like to take when approaching
issue #11165. The only two I/O objects that reasonably want to be "split" are
the network stream objects. Everything else can be "split" by just creating
another version.

The initial idea I had was the literally split the object into a reader and a
writer half, but that would just introduce lots of clutter with extra interfaces
that were a little unnnecssary, or it would return a ~Reader and a ~Writer which
means you couldn't access things like the remote peer name or local socket name.

The solution I found to be nicer was to just clone the stream itself. The clone
is just a clone of the handle, nothing fancy going on at the kernel level.
Conceptually I found this very easy to wrap my head around (everything else
supports clone()), and it solved the "split" problem at the same time.

The cloning support is pretty specific per platform/lib combination:

* native/win32 - uses some specific WSA apis to clone the SOCKET handle
* native/unix - uses dup() to get another file descriptor
* green/all - This is where things get interesting. When we support full clones
              of a handle, this implies that we're allowing simultaneous writes
              and reads to happen. It turns out that libuv doesn't support two
              simultaneous reads or writes of the same object. It does support
              *one* read and *one* write at the same time, however. Some extra
              infrastructure was added to just block concurrent writers/readers
              until the previous read/write operation was completed.

I've added tests to the tcp/unix modules to make sure that this functionality is
supported everywhere.
auto merge of #11894 : alexcrichton/rust/io-clone, r=brson

This is part of the overall strategy I would like to take when approaching
issue #11165. The only two I/O objects that reasonably want to be "split" are
the network stream objects. Everything else can be "split" by just creating
another version.

The initial idea I had was the literally split the object into a reader and a
writer half, but that would just introduce lots of clutter with extra interfaces
that were a little unnnecssary, or it would return a ~Reader and a ~Writer which
means you couldn't access things like the remote peer name or local socket name.

The solution I found to be nicer was to just clone the stream itself. The clone
is just a clone of the handle, nothing fancy going on at the kernel level.
Conceptually I found this very easy to wrap my head around (everything else
supports clone()), and it solved the "split" problem at the same time.

The cloning support is pretty specific per platform/lib combination:

* native/win32 - uses some specific WSA apis to clone the SOCKET handle
* native/unix - uses dup() to get another file descriptor
* green/all - This is where things get interesting. When we support full clones
              of a handle, this implies that we're allowing simultaneous writes
              and reads to happen. It turns out that libuv doesn't support two
              simultaneous reads or writes of the same object. It does support
              *one* read and *one* write at the same time, however. Some extra
              infrastructure was added to just block concurrent writers/readers
              until the previous read/write operation was completed.

I've added tests to the tcp/unix modules to make sure that this functionality is
supported everywhere.
Ensure an Rc isn't freed while running its own destructor.

A weak pointer inside itself will have its destructor run when the last
strong pointer to that data disappears, so we need to make sure that the
Weak and Rc destructors don't duplicate work (i.e. freeing).

By making the Rcs effectively take a weak pointer, we ensure that no
Weak destructor will free the pointer while still ensuring that Weak
pointers can't be upgraded to strong ones as the destructors run.

This approach of starting weak at 1 is what libstdc++ does.

Fixes #12046.
libstd: Add missing constants for arm/linux.
auto merge of #11989 : adridu59/rust/tidy, r=alexcrichton

Closes #11985
Closes #4533

@huonw, @alexcrichton
Make a double-write UDP test more robust

I have a hunch this just deadlocked the windows bots. Due to UDP being a lossy
protocol, I don't think we can guarantee that the server can receive both
packets, so just listen for one of them.
auto merge of #12054 : alexcrichton/rust/less-flaky-udp, r=brson

I have a hunch this just deadlocked the windows bots. Due to UDP being a lossy
protocol, I don't think we can guarantee that the server can receive both
packets, so just listen for one of them.
auto merge of #12001 : yuriks/rust/getopts-tweaks, r=brson

This complements `usage` by auto-generating a short one-liner summary
of the options.

(First timer here, be gentle... :)
auto merge of #12047 : huonw/rust/cyclic-rc, r=thestinger

A weak pointer inside itself will have its destructor run when the last
strong pointer to that data disappears, so we need to make sure that the
Weak and Rc destructors don't duplicate work (i.e. freeing).

By making the Rcs effectively take a weak pointer, we ensure that no
Weak destructor will free the pointer while still ensuring that Weak
pointers can't be upgraded to strong ones as the destructors run.

This approach of starting weak at 1 is what libstdc++ does.

Fixes #12046.
auto merge of #12051 : luqmana/rust/arm-fix, r=alexcrichton

Fix building for arm/Linux.