Benchmark numbers

```
> miniboxing-lib-bench/test
[info] Compiling 1 Scala source to /mnt/data1/Work/Workspace/dev/miniboxing-plugin/tests/lib-bench/target/scala-2.11/test-classes...
Starting miniboxed benchmark. Lay back, it might take a few minutes to stabilize...
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 100000)    :   12.40724
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 200000)    :   25.78922
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 300000)    :   35.21678
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 400000)    :   49.65674
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 500000)    :   58.43063
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 600000)    :   71.84013
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 700000)    :   81.73047
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 800000)    :   93.53947
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 900000)    :  104.61938
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1000000)   :  125.65359
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1100000)   :  130.44137
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1200000)   :  139.62021
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1300000)   :  153.09369
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1400000)   :  163.15288
  MiniboxedLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1500000)   :  176.32568
Starting miniboxed with bridges benchmark. Lay back, it might take a few minutes to stabilize...
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 100000)    :   14.33241
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 200000)    :   27.40087
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 300000)    :   41.71689
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 400000)    :   54.02929
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 500000)    :   65.23331
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 600000)    :   78.15383
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 700000)    :   91.75147
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 800000)    :  107.86718
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 900000)    :  116.35453
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1000000)   :  129.57010
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1100000)   :  142.78490
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1200000)   :  156.47381
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1300000)   :  169.35183
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1400000)   :  185.79403
  MiniboxedLinkedListWithLibraryFunctionsBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1500000)   :  196.01432
Starting generic benchmark. Lay back, it might take a few minutes to stabilize...
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 100000)    :   17.56597
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 200000)    :   32.71143
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 300000)    :   49.31552
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 400000)    :   65.80088
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 500000)    :   81.23240
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 600000)    :   96.97004
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 700000)    :  112.68284
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 800000)    :  131.21242
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 900000)    :  144.96134
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1000000)   :  162.42736
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1100000)   :  178.53030
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1200000)   :  193.99709
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1300000)   :  209.90358
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1400000)   :  225.30616
  GenericLinkedListBenchmark$.Least Squares Method with List[Double]: Parameters(size -> 1500000)   :  246.21709
[info] Passed: Total 0, Failed 0, Errors 0, Passed 0
[success] Total time: 506 s, completed Jul 13, 2014 9:00:18 PM
```
Diagnosing slowdowns - produced #114 and a change