Hey there,

We're a bit unsure of how we should proceed with the service manual changes
and 'elements' repo. We'd really like to publish in April - what do you
think? Does it help to separate out the service manual content changes from
the elements stuff?

Cheers

Tim


On 31 March 2014 09:24, James Abley <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In service-manual/user-centered-design/working-with-prototypes.md:
>
> > @@ -42,3 +42,15 @@ The [smart answer format](https://www.gov.uk/maternity-benefits "example of a sm
> >  As quickly as possible we prototyped the format using HTML and javascript so that it could be experienced in a web browser. That revealed more constraints, such as the fact that users might expect to be able to go back and amend an answer without realising that would change their whole journey through the format. This allowed us to quickly adjust the user interface to be clearer for its users before we started the work of building out the full system.
>
> @fatbusinessman <https://github.com/fatbusinessman> that seems based on
> @timpaul <https://github.com/timpaul>'s recent work to restyle large
> parts of the manual<https://github.com/alphagov/government-service-design-manual/compare/master...update-design-guides-joelanman>
> ?
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/alphagov/government-service-design-manual/pull/323/files#r11106955>
> .
>