po/TEAMS: add new member to German translation team

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
l10n: de.po: change Email to E-Mail

Change all Email to E-Mail, as this is the correct form in German.

Signed-off-by: Phillip Sz <phillip.szelat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
l10n: de.po: use comma before "um"

This patch adds a comma before the "um". See:
http://www.duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/komma#K117

Signed-off-by: Phillip Sz <phillip.szelat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Merge branch 'maint' of git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po into maint

* 'maint' of git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
  l10n: de.po: use comma before "um"
  l10n: de.po: change Email to E-Mail
  po/TEAMS: add new member to German translation team
Merge branch 'maint'

* maint:
  l10n: de.po: use comma before "um"
  l10n: de.po: change Email to E-Mail
  po/TEAMS: add new member to German translation team
teach read-tree to do content-level merges

Read-tree will resolve simple 3-way merges, such as a path
touched on one branch but not on the other. With
--aggressive, it will also do some more complex merges, like
both sides adding the same content. But it always stops
short of actually merging content, leaving the unmerged
paths in the index.

One can always use "git merge-index git-merge-one-file -a"
to do a content-level merge of these paths. However, that
has two disadvantages:

  1. It's slower, as we actually invoke merge-one-file for
     each unmerged path, which in turns writes temporary
     files to the filesystem.

  2. It requires a working directory to store the merged
     result. When working in a bare repository, this can be
     inconvenient.

Instead, let's have read-tree perform the content-level
merge in core. If it results in conflicts, read-tree can
simply punt and leave the unmerged entries in the index.