[SPARK-1940] Enabling rolling of executor logs, and automatic cleanup of old executor logs

Currently, in the default log4j configuration, all the executor logs get sent to the file <code>[executor-working-dir]/stderr</code>. This does not all log files to be rolled, so old logs cannot be removed.

Using log4j RollingFileAppender allows log4j logs to be rolled, but all the logs get sent to a different set of files, other than the files <code>stdout</code> and <code>stderr</code> . So the logs are not visible in the Spark web UI any more as Spark web UI only reads the files <code>stdout</code> and <code>stderr</code>. Furthermore, it still does not allow the stdout and stderr to be cleared periodically in case a large amount of stuff gets written to them (e.g. by explicit `println` inside map function).

This PR solves this by implementing a simple `RollingFileAppender` within Spark (disabled by default). When enabled (using configuration parameter `spark.executor.rollingLogs.enabled`), the logs can get rolled over either by time interval (set with `spark.executor.rollingLogs.interval`, set to daily by default), or by size of logs (set with  `spark.executor.rollingLogs.size`). Finally, old logs can be automatically deleted by specifying how many of the latest log files to keep (set with `spark.executor.rollingLogs.keepLastN`).  The web UI has also been modified to show the logs across the rolled-over files.


You can test this locally (without waiting a whole day) by setting  configuration `spark.executor.rollingLogs.enabled=true` and `spark.executor.rollingLogs.interval=minutely`. Continuously generate logs by running spark jobs and the generated logs files would look like this (`stderr` and `stdout` are the most current log file that are being written to). 

```
stderr
stderr--2014-05-27--14-37
stderr--2014-05-27--14-47
stderr--2014-05-27--15-05
stdout
stdout--2014-05-27--14-47
```

The web ui should show logs across these files.
Yeah the thing is - you already do a bunch of filesystem operations in the main thread, so I don't think the rollover is a big marginal difference (all of the meta-data operations are going to be roughly the same cost at the FS). In general these are going to be a small number of O(ms) operations that occur pretty infrequently, so probably not a huge deal.