Revert "mm: panic on the first bad page table entry access"

This reverts commit 215a2c3137b906afd66c93eb9fb3479a1f06e1c9.

Change-Id: Ica69d573fe0e2fab19ddfc3979513bdedb69c717
sync: Fix a race condition between release_obj and print_obj

Before this change, a timeline would only be removed from the timeline
list *after* the sync driver had its release_obj() called. However, the
driver's release_obj() may free resources needed by print_obj().

Although the timeline list is locked when print_obj() is called, it is
not locked when release_obj() is called. If one CPU was in print_obj()
when another was in release_obj(), the print_obj() may make unsafe
accesses.

It is not actually necessary to hold the timeline list lock when calling
release_obj() if the call is made after the timeline is unlinked from
the list, since there is no possibility another thread could be in --
or enter -- print_obj() for that timeline.

This change moves the release_obj() call to after the timeline is
unlinked, preventing the above race from occurring.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Strachan <alistair.strachan@imgtec.com>

Change-Id: I563347e163ac4ef19c2f5930c3ec10e61f5f5d44
sync: signal pt before sync_timeline object gets destroyed

There is a race condition

Assume we have *one* sync_fence object, with *one* sync_pt
which belongs to *one* sync_timeline, given this condition,
sync_timeline->kref will have two counts, one for sync_timeline
(implicit) and another for sync_pt.

Assume following is the situation on CPU

Theead-1 : (Thread which calls sync_timeline_destroy())
  -> (some function calls)
   -> sync_timeline_destory()
    -> sync_timeline_signal() (CPU is inside this
function after putting reference to sync_timeline)

At this time Thread-2 comes and does following

Thread-2 : (fclose on fence fd)
> sync_fence_release() -> because of fclose() on fence object
 -> sync_fence_free()
  -> sync_pt_free()
   -> kref_put(&pt->parent->kref, sync_timeline_free);
    -> sync_timeline_free() (CPU is inside this because
this time kref will be zero after _put)

Thread-2 will free sync_timeline object before Thread-1
has finished its work inside sync_timeline_signal.

With this change we signals all sync_pt before putting
reference to sync_timeline object.

Signed-off-by: Prakash Kamliya <pkamliya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@google.com>

Change-Id: Ic680e4d0bbef1c46bcb7cfba693395645241d203
cpuidle: make a single register function for all

The usual scheme to initialize a cpuidle driver on a SMP is:

	cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
		device = &per_cpu(cpuidle_dev, cpu);
		cpuidle_register_device(device);
	}

This code is duplicated in each cpuidle driver.

On UP systems, it is done this way:

	cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
	device = &per_cpu(cpuidle_dev, cpu);
	cpuidle_register_device(device);

On UP, the macro 'for_each_cpu' does one iteration:

        for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)

Hence, the initialization loop is the same for UP than SMP.

Beside, we saw different bugs / mis-initialization / return code unchecked in
the different drivers, the code is duplicated including bugs. After fixing all
these ones, it appears the initialization pattern is the same for everyone.

Please note, some drivers are doing dev->state_count = drv->state_count. This is
not necessary because it is done by the cpuidle_enable_device function in the
cpuidle framework. This is true, until you have the same states for all your
devices. Otherwise, the 'low level' API should be used instead with the specific
initialization for the driver.

Let's add a wrapper function doing this initialization with a cpumask parameter
for the coupled idle states and use it for all the drivers.

That will save a lot of LOC, consolidate the code, and the modifications in the
future could be done in a single place. Another benefit is the consolidation of
the cpuidle_device variable which is now in the cpuidle framework and no longer
spread accross the different arch specific drivers.

Change-Id: I8f75188d5770871620f758c2973b74384ac570d5
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Parsha <kparsha@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>