Update tocheck.csv

seems like my previous changes weren't updated...

so for

4. 'be', so how  do we index this as a "without" suffix or just remove it becaus the word it is modifying is already indexed in its own entry, e.g. be sabab will have two entries in be and sabab each
6. shouldn't gahvarah junbani be indexed as separate entries in gahvarah, and junbish since it is a compound?
7. getii is romanized as both getii and gitii in Platts but only as giti in Persian...do we maintain geti? i do have mostly heard giti even in the urdu context though...
8. girih is correct transliteration but then its transliterated as girih only in 85,6 and the other 4 instances ({13,6}, {17,9}, {30,3}, {30,3})it is transliterated as girah which platts says is a "vulgar" pronunciation
9. i have marked guun as guun correctly because that's the correct form, though platts mentions it as vulgar...(gūn, vulg. gūṅ), but its definitely nasalized here..however its use as chance/need/occasion (the translations in fp) i could not find in platts or steingass...
10. huujiye is inflected from hona but should it not be hojiye? [but that's a question for the primary text, not the concordance so marked as hona in tocheck.csv
16. we probably don't need ki (of) in the concordance? it would be interesting to keep it though to see how mnay times he uses izafat vs the possessive particles like ki, kaa, ke..
21. for na-shunidan, we know that the verb is shunidan...do we want to separate the na- as a general prefix of negation, just like for be- above? also, shunidan should be marked as shunidan? or as sunna? or both? (cross referencing?)