dts: overclock CPU to 2.72Ghz
qcom-cpufreq: Move the enabling of the CPU/L2 clocks to CPU_STARTING

It is a requirement of PLLs in MSM SoCs that the PLL power
supplies be enabled while the PLL is running. If the PLL is
locked and outputs enabled, turning off the regulator(s)
supplying the PLL will cause the PLL to enter an unpredictable
state.

Now in the CPU_UP_PREPARE notifier, the CPU clocks are prepared
and enabled, causing the source HFPLLs to also turn on. Note
that the CPU isn't clocked yet. It is possible that execution is
pre-empted and the CPU running the notifier enters power
collapse. If all other CPUs also enter power collapse, then it
is possible for an RPM notification to go out, allowing the RPM
to transition the Apps processor to its sleep set. This can
result in the HFPLL supplies being turned off while the HFPLL is
running, violating the requirement mentioned above. Once the CPU
is unclamped, the CPU is effectively unclocked, due to the HFPLL
being in an unknown state.

There is a check that is enabled in the PM code's CPU_UP_PREPARE
notifier callback. This check ensures that the problematic RPM
notification cannot occur until the core that is being brought
online also enters power collapse. However, there is no ordering
guarantee between that PM's hotplug notifier callback's execution
and the cpufreq hotplug notifier callback's execution. This
ordering depends on program link order, which is unreliable.

It is necessary to ensure that once the HFPLL is enabled, the
RPM cannot transition apps to its sleep set. Move the enabling
of the CPU clocks to the CPU_STARTING notifier, which runs on
the CPU bring brought online. The CPU_STARTING notifier is
guaranteed to run after the CPU_UP_PREPARE notifier, which
implies that the aforementioned do-not-notify-rpm check is
executed *before* the HFPLL is enabled. Therefore even if all
cores enter power collapse after the HFPLL is enabled, the
HFPLL supplies are guaranteed to stay on, or the CPU clock
is switched to the safe source and the HFPLL is turned off.

CRs-Fixed: 622738
Change-Id: I136841405806c07e755919859e649ded0c719abb
Signed-off-by: Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org>
ion: retry during race with shrinking/allocating

There exists a race between shrinking/allocating

Thread 1:                           Thread:2
mutex_lock(&sheap->alloc_lock)
ion_secure_cma_add_to_pool()
mutex_lock(&sheap->chunk_lock)
chunk->cnt = 0
mutex_unlock(&sheap->chunk_lock)
                                    ion_secure_cma_shrinker
                                    mutex_lock(&sheap->chunk_lock)
                                    __ion_secure_cma_shrink_pool
                                    chunk->cnt == 0 for the
                                       just allocated chunk
                                    ion_secure_cma-free_chunk
ion_secure_cma_alloc_from_pool
no memory to allocate!

If this race happens, just retry adding memory to the pool instead
of BUGing out the system.

Change-Id: Ic95782db6d88a33f01dcc5248fc957ca0f378078
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Increase sync thread policy and priority

More or less all cpufreq related threads run in a high priority.

Also, CMs patch series was somehow out of sync and incomplete,
readd the unchanged policy update to source cpu bit. And readd
the check for a possible corner case in try_to_wake_up() that
was already missing before.
cpufreq: interactive: timer_rate at 20k is too low and rapes battery life.

Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
Revert "rtc: alarm: Proper handling of spinlock"

This reverts commit 09fba866e21a901b55d1002d02d9b6415e3a47c7.
cpufreq: ondemand:Fix NULL check for dbs_info->cur_policy

dbs_info->cur_policy can go NULL when processing
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS, NULL check is required
before processing it

Change-Id: Iba99b563e230835dfcd24573335065d68ad25821
CRs-fixed: 576272
Signed-off-by: Swetha Chikkaboraiah <schikk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
cpufreq: ondemand:kernel NULL pointer dereference at dbs_check_cpu

Function dbs_check_cpu  calls __cpufreq_driver_getavg
With  policy as IN/OUT parameter.
There is possiblity of policy becoming NULL in
 __cpufreq_driver_getavg. Same policy is getting
accessed in the for loop which leads to NULL pointer dereference.
So NULL check is required for the policy

CRs-fixed: 582925
Change-Id: Ib8d8de8d66500430a5aa4c275937640e4f934aa8
Signed-off-by: Swetha Chikkaboraiah <schikk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
cpufreq_ondemand: squashed commits
drivers: cpufreq: Add nightmare and pegasusq governors

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>