Target: invert condition for Windows

The Microsoft ABI and MSVCRT are considered the canonical C runtime and ABI.
The long double routines are not part of this environment.  However, cygwin and
MinGW both provide supplementary implementations.  Change the condition to
reflect this reality.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213896 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[x86] Make vector legalization of extloads work more like the "normal"
vector operation legalization with support for custom target lowering
and fallback to expand when it fails, and use this to implement sext and
anyext load lowering for x86 in a more principled way.

Previously, the x86 backend relied on a target DAG combine to "combine
away" sextload and extload nodes prior to legalization, or would expand
them during legalization with terrible code. This is particularly
problematic because the DAG combine relies on running over non-canonical
DAG nodes at just the right time to match several common and important
patterns. It used a combine rather than lowering because we didn't have
good lowering support, and to expose some tricks being employed to more
combine phases.

With this change it becomes a proper lowering operation, the backend
marks that it can lower these nodes, and I've added support for handling
the canonical forms that don't have direct legal representations such as
sextload of a v4i8 -> v4i64 on AVX1. With this change, our test cases
for this behavior continue to pass even after the DAG combiner beigns
running more systematically over every node.

There is some noise caused by this in the test suite where we actually
use vector extends instead of subregister extraction. This doesn't
really seem like the right thing to do, but is unlikely to be a critical
regression. We do regress in one case where by lowering to the
target-specific patterns early we were able to combine away extraneous
legal math nodes. However, this regression is completely addressed by
switching to a widening based legalization which is what I'm working
toward anyways, so I've just switched the test to that mode.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4654

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213897 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[SDAG] Introduce a combined set to the DAG combiner which tracks nodes
which have successfully round-tripped through the combine phase, and use
this to ensure all operands to DAG nodes are visited by the combiner,
even if they are only added during the combine phase.

This is critical to have the combiner reach nodes that are *introduced*
during combining. Previously these would sometimes be visited and
sometimes not be visited based on whether they happened to end up on the
worklist or not. Now we always run them through the combiner.

This fixes quite a few bad codegen test cases lurking in the suite while
also being more principled. Among these, the TLS codegeneration is
particularly exciting for programs that have this in the critical path
like TSan-instrumented binaries (although I think they engineer to use
a different TLS that is faster anyways).

I've tried to check for compile-time regressions here by running llc
over a merged (but not LTO-ed) clang bitcode file and observed at most
a 3% slowdown in llc. Given that this is essentially a worst case (none
of opt or clang are running at this phase) I think this is tolerable.
The actual LTO case should be even less costly, and the cost in normal
compilation should be negligible.

With this combining logic, it is possible to re-legalize as we combine
which is necessary to implement PSHUFB formation on x86 as
a post-legalize DAG combine (my ultimate goal).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4638

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Don't use 128bit functions on PPC32.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After unrolling a loop with llvm.loop.unroll.count metadata (unroll factor
hint) the loop unroller replaces the llvm.loop.unroll.count metadata with
llvm.loop.unroll.disable metadata to prevent any subsequent unrolling
passes from unrolling more than the hint indicates.  This patch fixes
an issue where loop unrolling could be disabled for other loops as well which
share the same llvm.loop metadata.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213900 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8