I think @JeffryBooher meant the new line 271-273 in this version of the file (which is the old lines 265-267). But if I'm understanding that case, we actually do want to treat the file as watched there, because it really is watched (it's just that the underlying implementation doesn't require a physical watcher to be created for each file). In this case, we don't want to treat it as watched, because we don't want to cache its contents.