debug: remove: remove some dmesg logspam from Linux mainline 3.4 fs
debug: remove: tty makefile remove smux_debug
debug: remove: tty remove smux debugging
debug: remove: mach-msm remove smd debugging
debug: remove: not cool to force that debugging
lowmemorykiller: make default lowmemorykiller debug message useful

lowmemorykiller debug messages are inscrutable and mostly useful
for debugging the lowmemorykiller, not explaining why a process
was killed.  Make the messages more useful by prefixing them
with "lowmemorykiller: " and explaining in more readable terms
what was killed, who it was killed for, and why it was killed.

The messages now look like:
[   76.997631] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'droid.gallery3d' (2172), adj 1000,
[   76.997635]    to free 27436kB on behalf of 'kswapd0' (29) because
[   76.997638]    cache 122624kB is below limit 122880kB for oom_score_adj 1000
[   76.997641]    Free memory is -53356kB above reserved

A negative number for free memory above reserved means some of the
reserved memory has been used and is being regenerated by kswapd,
which is likely what called the shrinkers.

Change-Id: I1fe983381e73e124b90aa5d91cb66e55eaca390f
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
msm: makefile: we don't need these in mako

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER

Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
to reflect the relative capacity of each core

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1341826026-6504-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
cpufreq: Fix policy getting stuck when user & kernel min/max don't overlap

Every __cpufreq_set_policy starts with checking the new policy min/max has
some overlap with the current policy min/max. This works out fine until we
end up with the policy min/max being set to a range that doesn't overlap
with the user policy min/max. Once we get into this situation, the check at
the start of __cpufreq_set_policy fails and prevents us from getting out of
this state.

This only happens when one of the CPUFREQ_ADJUST/CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifiers called inside __cpufreq_set_policy pick a min/max outside the
range of user policy min/max.

The real intent of the check at the start of __cpufreq_set_policy is to
make sure userspace can't set user policy min > user policy max. Since
__cpufreq_set_policy always gets called only with current user policy
min/max except when the actual user space policy min/max is changed, we can
fix the issue by simply checking the new policy min/max against current
user policy min/max.

Change-Id: Iaac805825e64d7985c41fb9052bd96baacdf3d6f
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
netfilter: xt_qtaguid: Remove debug messages

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Halfbreed && Remove Some else