PR15693 - Fix spurious *running events, thread state, dprintf-style call

If one sets a breakpoint with a condition that involves calling a
function in the inferior, and then the condition evaluates false, GDB
outputs one *running event for each time the program hits the
breakpoint.  E.g.,

  $ gdb return-false -i=mi

  (gdb)
  start
  ...
  (gdb)
  b 14 if return_false ()
  &"b 14 if return_false ()\n"
  ~"Breakpoint 2 at 0x4004eb: file return-false.c, line 14.\n"
  ...
  ^done
  (gdb)
  c
  &"c\n"
  ~"Continuing.\n"
  ^running
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  (gdb)
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  *running,thread-id=(...)
  ... repeat forever ...

An easy way a user can trip on this is with a dprintf with "set
dprintf-style call".  In that case, a dprintf is just a breakpoint
that when hit GDB calls the printf function in the inferior, and then
resumes it, just like the case above.

If the breakpoint/dprintf is set in a loop, then these spurious events
can potentially slow down a frontend much, if it decides to refresh
its GUI whenever it sees this event (Eclipse is one such case).

When we run an infcall, we pretend we don't actually run the inferior.
This is already handled for the usual case of calling a function
directly from the CLI:

 (gdb)
 p return_false ()
 &"p return_false ()\n"
 ~"$1 = 0"
 ~"\n"
 ^done
 (gdb)

Note no *running, nor *stopped events.  That's handled by:

 static void
 mi_on_resume (ptid_t ptid)
 {
...
   /* Suppress output while calling an inferior function.  */
   if (tp->control.in_infcall)
     return;

and equivalent code on normal_stop.

However, in the cases of the PR, after finishing the infcall there's
one more resume, and mi_on_resume doesn't know that it should suppress
output then too, somehow.

The "running/stopped" state is a high level user/frontend state.
Internal stops are invisible to the frontend.  If follows from that
that we should be setting the thread to running at a higher level
where we still know the set of threads the user _intends_ to resume.

Currently we mark a thread as running from within target_resume, a low
level target operation.  As consequence, today, if we resume a
multi-threaded program while stopped at a breakpoint, we see this:

 -exec-continue
 ^running
 *running,thread-id="1"
 (gdb)
 *running,thread-id="all"

The first *running was GDB stepping over the breakpoint, and the
second is GDB finally resuming everything.

Between those two *running's, threads other than "1" still have their
state set to stopped.  That's bogus -- in async mode, this opens a
tiny window between both resumes where the user might try to run
another execution command to threads other than thread 1, and very
much confuse GDB.

That is, the "step" below should fail the "step", complaining that the
thread is running:

  (gdb) c -a &
  (gdb) thread 2
  (gdb) step

IOW, threads that GDB happens to not resume immediately (say, because
it needs to step over a breakpoint) shall still be marked as running.

Then, if we move marking threads as running to a higher layer,
decoupled from target_resume, plus skip marking threads as running
when running an infcall, the spurious *running events disappear,
because there will be no state transitions at all.

I think we might end up adding a new thread state -- THREAD_INFCALL or
some such, however since infcalls are always synchronous today, I
didn't find a need.  There's no way to execute a CLI/MI command
directly from the prompt if some thread is running an infcall.

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.

gdb/
2014-05-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR PR15693
	* infrun.c (resume): Determine how much to resume depending on
	whether the caller wanted a step, not whether we can hardware step
	the target.  Mark all threads that we intend to run as running,
	unless we're calling an inferior function.
	(normal_stop): If the thread is running an infcall, don't finish
	thread state.
	* target.c (target_resume): Don't mark threads as running here.

gdb/testsuite/
2014-05-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
	    Hui Zhu  <hui@codesourcery.com>

	PR PR15693
	* gdb.mi/mi-condbreak-call-thr-state-mt.c: New file.
	* gdb.mi/mi-condbreak-call-thr-state-st.c: New file.
	* gdb.mi/mi-condbreak-call-thr-state.c: New file.
	* gdb.mi/mi-condbreak-call-thr-state.exp: New file.
PR gdb/15713 - errors from i386_linux_resume lead to lock-up

linux_nat_resume is not considering that linux_ops->to_resume may throw:

  /* Mark LWP as not stopped to prevent it from being continued by
     linux_nat_resume_callback.  */
  lp->stopped = 0;

  if (resume_many)
    iterate_over_lwps (ptid, linux_nat_resume_callback, NULL);

If something within linux_nat_resume_callback throws, GDB leaves the
lwp_info as if the inferior was resumed, while it actually wasn't.

A couple examples, there are possibly others:

 - i386_linux_resume calls target_read which calls QUIT.
 - if the actual ptrace resumption fails in inf_ptrace_resume,
   perror_with_name is called.

If the user tries to kill the inferior at this point (or quit, which
offers to kill), GDB locks up trying to stop the lwp -- if it is
already stopped no new waitpid event gets generated for it.

Fix this by setting the stopped flag earlier, as soon as we collect a
stop event with waitpid, and clearing it always only after resuming
the lwp successfully.

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.  Confirmed the lock-up disappears using a
local hack that forces an error in inf_ptrace_resume.

Also fixes a little "set debug lin-lwp" annoyance.  Currently we always see:

 Continuing.
 LLR: Preparing to resume process 6802, 0, inferior_ptid Thread 0x7ffff7fc7740 (LWP 6802)
                                                                                ^^^^^^^^
 RC: Resuming sibling Thread 0x7ffff77c5700 (LWP 6807), 0, resume
 RC: Resuming sibling Thread 0x7ffff7fc6700 (LWP 6806), 0, resume
 RC: Not resuming sibling Thread 0x7ffff7fc7740 (LWP 6802) (not stopped)
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 LLR: PTRACE_CONT process 6802, 0 (resume event thread)

This patch gets rid of the "Not resuming sibling" line.

2014-05-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/15713
	* linux-nat.c (linux_nat_resume_callback): Rename the second
	parameter to 'except'.  Skip LP if it points to EXCEPT.
	(linux_nat_resume): Don't mark the event lwp as not stopped
	before resuming sibling lwps.  Instead ask
	linux_nat_resume_callback to skip the event lwp.  Mark it as not
	stopped after actually resuming it.
	(linux_handle_syscall_trap): Mark the lwp as not stopped after
	resuming it.
	(wait_lwp): Mark the lwp as stopped here.
	(stop_wait_callback): Mark the lwp as not stopped right after
	resuming it.  Don't mark lwps as stopped here.
	(linux_nat_filter_event): Mark the lwp as stopped earlier.
	(linux_nat_wait_1): Don't mark dead lwps as stopped here.