cpufreq: ondemand: fix timer-related list corruption in store_powersave_bias()

The dbs_timer_init() call in store_powersave_bias() re-initializes the
dbs_info workqueue, call on dbs_timer_exit() to ensure
outstanding work is cleared prior to making this call. Also, grab the
percpu timer_mutex lock to avoid race conditions with respect to the
dbs timer.

Change-Id: I79f3d43eeb51d2d8e21edd0fe043d6583333951f
Signed-off-by: Osvaldo Banuelos <osvaldob@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>
cpufreq: interactive: Remove trace event from idle_start handler

Removed the trace_cpufreq_interactive_idle_start.
Also fix a crash resulting from accessing NULL policy before taking
the pcpu->enable_sem lock. The policy can be NULL if the core is
hotplugged out before the enable_sem lock is taken.

Change-Id: I7e2809cc016b3b383a44cdf3c697013e2d2b5417
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>
ondemand: add sysfs entry for down_diff_multi_core

This change adds sysfs entry for the ondemand governor's attribute
down_differential_multi_core. This is required to be able to program
this knob to attain better perf/power for use cases like camcorder.

CRs-fixed: 561456
Change-Id: Ib7c1223215c6b714c286c231ed37f3abfae741c6
Signed-off-by: Krishna Vanka <kvanka@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>
cpufreq: interactive: Modifying sync_freq implementation

1. Check for up_threshold_any_cpu_freq instead of sync_freq to
   boost the frequency to sync_freq.
2. Change the load threshold name from sync_freq_load_threshold to
   up_threshold_any_cpu_load
3. Do not consider CPUs with load less than up_threshold_any_cpu_load
   while evaluating max load across CPUs

Change-Id: Ia0e537edbf38a5006c1a22f5c472daa0d086ffc9
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>
cpufreq: interactive: Use default min_sample_time if SDF is zero

Use min_sample_time to step down from max frequencies if
sampling_down_factor is set to zero.

Change-Id: I2e89bef6220557cb95efd20d658e0c05753b4c3c
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>
cpufreq: Fix policy getting stuck when user & kernel min/max don't overlap

Every __cpufreq_set_policy starts with checking the new policy min/max has
some overlap with the current policy min/max. This works out fine until we
end up with the policy min/max being set to a range that doesn't overlap
with the user policy min/max. Once we get into this situation, the check at
the start of __cpufreq_set_policy fails and prevents us from getting out of
this state.

This only happens when one of the CPUFREQ_ADJUST/CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifiers called inside __cpufreq_set_policy pick a min/max outside the
range of user policy min/max.

The real intent of the check at the start of __cpufreq_set_policy is to
make sure userspace can't set user policy min > user policy max. Since
__cpufreq_set_policy always gets called only with current user policy
min/max except when the actual user space policy min/max is changed, we can
fix the issue by simply checking the new policy min/max against current
user policy min/max.

Change-Id: Iaac805825e64d7985c41fb9052bd96baacdf3d6f
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: houst0nn <houstonn@gmail.com>