On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:04:15AM -0700, Joffrey F wrote:
> > @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
> > -test:
> 
> Assuming this is a symlink, seems like it would be cleaner to just
> remove those files (especially since they were just here for
> reference in the first place)

Maybe you think they were only there for reference, but I don't see
why someone couldn't have been using:

  DOCKER_REGISTRY_CONFIG=config_test.yml

or whatever when starting their registry.  *I* don't mind removing the
files, since I still think we're in the “users can be expected to read
release notes” stage of development.  However, @dmp42 at least seems
to prefer more backward compatibility [1].  Maybe the risk of breakage
for folks using DOCKER_REGISTRY_CONFIG to point at example configs is
acceptable, and we don't need *that* much backward compatibility?

[1]: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker-registry/pull/350#issuecomment-42689020