The code no longer contains the runtime support to prevent the conflicts
with wicket-annotation.  It is ready from my point of view.


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:26 AM, John Sarman <johnsarman@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am just going to remove my port of it for now, also I will remove the
> one file I borrowed from it the ArrayList extended class, and just use an
> ArrayList.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Martin Grigorov <notifications@github.com
> > wrote:
>
>> In
>> jdk-1.6-parent/wicket-mount-parent/wicket-mount-runtime/src/test/java/org/wicketstuff/wicket/mount/runtime/config/MatchingResourcesTest.java:
>>
>> > + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>> > + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>> > + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>> > + * limitations under the License.
>> > + */
>> > +package org.wicketstuff.wicket.mount.runtime.config;
>> > +
>> > +import java.net.URL;
>> > +
>> > +import junit.framework.TestCase;
>> > +import org.slf4j.Logger;
>> > +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
>> > +import org.springframework.core.io.Resource;
>> > +
>> > +/**
>> > + * @author Doug Donohoe
>>
>> wicket-annotations is indeed not the best name to explain its purpose but
>> this project is one of the most used WicketStuff projects and we cannot fix
>> this without annoying its users.
>>
>> wicket-annotations is not split in core, impl1, impl2 but isn't it
>> possible to depend on the big/fat module for the needs of
>> wicket-mount-runtime ?
>>
>> Do it as you find the best.
>> Just add a comment when you are ready with any final improvements and I
>> will merge this PR.
>>
>> --
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/291/files#r10516190>
>> .
>>
>
>