utf8.c: partially update to version 6.3

Unicode 6.3 defines more code points as combining or accents.  For
example, the character "ö" could be expressed as an "o" followed by
U+0308 COMBINING DIARESIS (aka umlaut, double-dot-above).  We should
consider that such a sequence of two codepoints occupies one display
column for the alignment purposes, and for that, git_wcwidth()
should return 0 for them.  Affected codepoints are:

    U+0358..U+035C
    U+0487
    U+05A2, U+05BA, U+05C5, U+05C7
    U+0604, U+0616..U+061A, U+0659..U+065F

Earlier unicode standards had defined these as "reserved".

Only the range 0..U+07FF has been checked to see which codepoints
need to be marked as 0-width while preparing for this commit; more
updates may be needed.

Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test: fix t7001 cp to use POSIX options

Since 11502468 and 04c1ee57 (both first appearing in v1.8.5), the
t7001-mv test has used "cp -a" to perform a copy in several of the
tests.

However, the "-a" option is not required for a POSIX cp utility and
some platforms' cp utilities do not support it.

The POSIX equivalent of -a is -R -P -p.

Change "cp -a" to "cp -R -P -p" so that the t7001-mv test works
on systems with a cp utility that only implements the POSIX
required set of options and not the "-a" option.

Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test: fix t5560 on FreeBSD

Since fd0a8c2e (first appearing in v1.7.0), the
t/t5560-http-backend-noserver.sh test has used a backslash escape
inside a ${} expansion in order to specify a literal '?' character.

Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh does not interpret this correctly.

In a POSIX compliant shell, the following:

x='one?two?three'
echo "${x#*\?}"

Would be expected to produce this:

two?three

When using the FreeBSD /bin/sh instead you get this:

one?two?three

In fact the FreeBSD /bin/sh treats the backslash as a literal
character to match so that this:

y='one\two\three'
echo "${y#*\?}"

Produces this unexpected value:

wo\three

In this case the backslash is not only treated literally, it also
fails to defeat the special meaning of the '?' character.

Instead, we can use the [...] construct to defeat the special meaning
of the '?' character and match it exactly in a way that works for the
FreeBSD /bin/sh as well as other POSIX /bin/sh implementations.

Changing the example like so:

x='one?two?three'
echo "${x#*[?]}"

Produces the expected output using the FreeBSD /bin/sh.

Therefore, change the use of \? to [?] in order to be compatible with
the FreeBSD /bin/sh which allows t/t5560-http-backend-noserver.sh to
pass on FreeBSD again.

Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD

Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4)
the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution
of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that
dot-sourced it.  The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves
poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed.

In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function,
then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not
itself inside a function), control will return from the function
that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might
follow the dot command inside that function.  Commit 99855ddf (first
appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command
the last line in the function.

Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements
in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the
troublesome "return".  The fix in 99855ddf does not address this
problem.

For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents:

run_script2() {
        . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh"
        _e=$?
        echo only this line should show
        [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e
        return 3
}
run_script2
e=$?
[ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; }

And script2.sh with these contents:

if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
        return 5
fi
case bad in *)
        echo always shows
esac
echo should not get here
! :

When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh'
after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell
is simply the single line:

only this line should show

However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output
appears instead:

should not get here
expected status 3 got 1

Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2
function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh
following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the
"echo always shows" line did not run).

These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in
script2.sh.  If script2.sh is changed to this:

main() {
        if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
                return 5
        fi
        case bad in *)
                echo always shows
        esac
        echo should not get here
        ! :
}
main

Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using
other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations.

We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving
the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own
function and then calling that as the last line in the script.

Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"

This reverts commit 99855ddf4bd319cd06a0524e755ab1c1b7d39f3b.

The workaround 99855ddf introduced to deal with problematic
"return" statements in scripts run by "dot" commands located
inside functions only handles one part of the problem.  The
issue has now been addressed by not using "return" statements
in this way in the git-rebase--*.sh scripts.

This workaround is therefore no longer necessary, so clean
up the code by reverting it.

Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-prompt.sh: don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1

Both bash and zsh subject the value of PS1 to parameter expansion,
command substitution, and arithmetic expansion.  Rather than include
the raw, unescaped branch name in PS1 when running in two- or
three-argument mode, construct PS1 to reference a variable that holds
the branch name.  Because the shells do not recursively expand, this
avoids arbitrary code execution by specially-crafted branch names such
as '$(IFS=_;cmd=sudo_rm_-rf_/;$cmd)'.

Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-p4: format-patch to diff-tree change breaks binary patches

When applying binary patches a full index is required. format-patch
already handles this, but diff-tree needs '--full-index' argument
to always output full index. When git-p4 runs git-apply to test
the patch, git-apply rejects the patch due to abbreviated blob
object names. This is the error message git-apply emits in this
case:

    error: cannot apply binary patch to '<filename>' without full index line
    error: <filename>: patch does not apply

Signed-off-by: Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'km/avoid-cp-a' into maint

Some tests used shell constructs that did not work well on FreeBSD

* km/avoid-cp-a:
  test: fix t7001 cp to use POSIX options
Merge branch 'km/avoid-bs-in-shell-glob' into maint

Some tests used shell constructs that did not work well on FreeBSD

* km/avoid-bs-in-shell-glob:
  test: fix t5560 on FreeBSD
Merge branch 'tb/unicode-6.3-zero-width' into maint

Some more Unicode codepoints defined in Unicode 6.3 as having zero
width have been taught to our display column counting logic.

* tb/unicode-6.3-zero-width:
  utf8.c: partially update to version 6.3
Merge branch 'km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase' into maint

"git rebase" used a POSIX shell construct FreeBSD /bin/sh does not
work well with.

* km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase:
  Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"
  rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
Merge branch 'rh/prompt-pcmode-avoid-eval-on-refname' into maint

The shell prompt script (in contrib/), when using the PROMPT_COMMAND
interface, used an unsafe construct when showing the branch name in
$PS1.

* rh/prompt-pcmode-avoid-eval-on-refname:
  git-prompt.sh: don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1
Merge branch 'cl/p4-use-diff-tree' into maint

"git p4" dealing with changes in binary files were broken by a
change in 1.9 release.

* cl/p4-use-diff-tree:
  git-p4: format-patch to diff-tree change breaks binary patches
Start preparing for 1.9.3

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
shell doc: remove stray "+" in example

The git-shell(1) manpage says

	EXAMPLE
	       To disable interactive logins, displaying a greeting
		instead:

		+

		   $ chsh -s /usr/bin/git-shell
		   $ mkdir $HOME/git-shell-commands
[...]

The stray "+" has been there ever since the example was added in
v1.8.3-rc0~210^2 (shell: new no-interactive-login command to print a
custom message, 2013-03-09).  The "+" sign between paragraphs is
needed in asciidoc to attach extra paragraphs to a list item but here
it is not needed and ends up rendered as a literal "+".  Remove it.

A quick search with "grep -e '<p>+' /usr/share/doc/git/html/*.html"
doesn't find any other instances of this problem.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git 1.9.3

The third maintenance release for Git 1.9; contains all the fixes
that are scheduled to appear in Git 2.0 since 1.9.2.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t5516 (fetch-push): fix test restoration

We shouldn't modify the commits; it screws the following tests.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Add concept of 'publish' branch

The publish branch is the branch the user wants to push to, akin to the
upstream branch, which is the branch the user wants to use as a
baseline. It overrides other configurations, such as push.default, and
remote.<name>.push.

The upstream branch is:

  branch.$name.remote
  branch.$name.merge

The publish branch is:

  branch.$name.pushremote
  branch.$name.push

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
branch: add --set-publish-to option

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
push: add --set-publish option

To setup publish tracking branch, like 'git branch --set-publish'.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>