modified files
ARM: hw_breakpoint: enable HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT feature flag
HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT was disabled temporarily from commit
480a82f59712136b51ee5ca05c4f22c1738010c5. Issue not seen with the
latest kernel hence re-enable the feature and fix merge issue from
previous kernel upgrade.

Change-Id: Ia6e7e8282c848dd73108e4d951b3375bb7caa63c
Signed-off-by: Jin Hong <jinh@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
________________

ARM: hw_breakpoint: Clear breakpoints before enabling monitor mode
The reset value of the BCR, BVR, WCR, and WVR registers are all
UNKNOWN on ARMv7. Unfortunately, reset_ctrl_regs() clears these
registers *after* enabling monitor mode, not before, and so some
implementations may experience UNPREDICTABLE behavior if the
reset values of these registers are non-zero. Clear the
breakpoints before enabling monitor mode so that we don't
experience boot hangs/loops due to breakpoints being enabled
out of reset.

Change-Id: I029fbe40725e803183544ddd6fe40285de4137e8
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
enabled hw breakpoint
mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP

commit 7cb2ef56e6a8b7b368b2e883a0a47d02fed66911 upstream.

I am working with a tool that simulates oracle database I/O workload.
This tool (orion to be specific -
<http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/iodesign.htm#autoId24>)
allocates hugetlbfs pages using shmget() with SHM_HUGETLB flag.  It then
does aio into these pages from flash disks using various common block
sizes used by database.  I am looking at performance with two of the most
common block sizes - 1M and 64K.  aio performance with these two block
sizes plunged after Transparent HugePages was introduced in the kernel.
Here are performance numbers:

		pre-THP		2.6.39		3.11-rc5
1M read		8384 MB/s	5629 MB/s	6501 MB/s
64K read	7867 MB/s	4576 MB/s	4251 MB/s

I have narrowed the performance impact down to the overheads introduced by
THP in __get_page_tail() and put_compound_page() routines.  perf top shows
>40% of cycles being spent in these two routines.  Every time direct I/O
to hugetlbfs pages starts, kernel calls get_page() to grab a reference to
the pages and calls put_page() when I/O completes to put the reference
away.  THP introduced significant amount of locking overhead to get_page()
and put_page() when dealing with compound pages because hugepages can be
split underneath get_page() and put_page().  It added this overhead
irrespective of whether it is dealing with hugetlbfs pages or transparent
hugepages.  This resulted in 20%-45% drop in aio performance when using
hugetlbfs pages.

Since hugetlbfs pages can not be split, there is no reason to go through
all the locking overhead for these pages from what I can see.  I added
code to __get_page_tail() and put_compound_page() to bypass all the
locking code when working with hugetlbfs pages.  This improved performance
significantly.  Performance numbers with this patch:

		pre-THP		3.11-rc5	3.11-rc5 + Patch
1M read		8384 MB/s	6501 MB/s	8371 MB/s
64K read	7867 MB/s	4251 MB/s	6510 MB/s

Performance with 64K read is still lower than what it was before THP, but
still a 53% improvement.  It does mean there is more work to be done but I
will take a 53% improvement for now.

Please take a look at the following patch and let me know if it looks
reasonable.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments]
Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
msm: cpufreq: boost freq of online cpu(s) to max on resume
Resume events cause several tasks to initiate such as WiFi connect,
data sync, etc. that require cpu cycles. Instead of waiting for the cpu
governor to increase the cpu frequency which occur after an unpleasant delay,
start at the max frequency and the cpu governor will scale the frequency
back as soon as possible. This shouldn't have any noticeable impact on battery
life.
--mrg666
arm: Allow CPU-supported unaligned accesses
This change reconfigures the CPU to allow CPU-supported unaligned
accesses, which are generally faster than software-only fixups,
resulting in fewer alignment exceptions.

Signed-off-by: Brent DeGraaf <bdegraaf@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/configs/mako_config

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/configs/mako_config
enabled unaligned access for cpu
cpufreq: Retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus
cpufreq's handling of cpu online event can incorrectly initialize
managed_policy->cpus to include offline cpus. This causes cpufreq
governors to include offline cpus in their idle time computation, which
causes frequency to shoot up beyond normal levels (on systems where 2 or
more cpus need to be synchronized wrt frequency change).

This frequency shootup was not seen prior to commit 21111be8 which
changed idle time accounting for offline cpus. Prior to commit 21111be8,
idle time statistics for offline cpus would include their offline time
as well. Post commit 21111be8, offline time is not included in a cpu's
idle time statistics.

As a result, ondemand (or other cpufreq) governors would see unchanged
idle time for offline cpus, causing them to interpret those (offline)
cpus as 100% busy, which is wrong.

This patch fixes the issue by modifying cpufreq's hotplug handling to
retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus field. cpufreq governors
would then skip such offline cpus from idle time calculations.

Change-Id: Id2eba8c0ec3367609369b2e42a4e1386ff2e7ab5
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
re-enabled qce (qualcomm crypto accelerator)