corrected name in l. 3, added intro and commentary.  Also added BL corrections already submitted by U. Gad.  Links to texts in commentary are still not working for me (tried Chrome, Firefox, and IE).

 - corrected name in l. 3, added intro and commentary.  Also added BL corrections already submitted by U. Gad.  Links to texts in commentary are still not working for me (tried Chrome, Firefox, and IE).

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - AcceptText - The reading looks good to me. The identification of Aunes, son of Harthotes, as one of the persons discussed in the archive of Harthotes also seems quite clear to me. (James Cowey)
 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept. See Cowey's. To my eye, υν in Αὐνῆς is not immediately apparent from Plate I, but if the nu is larger and blockier but not otherwise much unlike that in δεκανὸς, then it seems plausible. Then, for the upsilon, I suppose I see the bottom of one formed rather like the first upsilon in Κλαυδίου (l.1).  (Joshua D. Sosin)
 - Finalized - Ready. Added the links in the commentary by hand into the xml. (James Cowey)
Z. 11 [κα]ὶ̣ → [ὃ κα]ὶ̣ (das Relativpronomen ist wegen des Satzanschlusses erforderlich). 
Die folgenden Vorschläge anhand der Abbildung im Internet: 
Z. 12: οὐθὲ → οὐθὲν̣; 
Z. 12/13: οὐ|[θὲ] → οὐ|[δὲ]; 
Z. 18: Ἐπὶφ → Ἐπεὶφ und Ἡρακλῆς ὁ καὶ → Ἡρακλᾶς ὃς καὶ; 
Z. 21/22: οὐ|δὲ → οὐ|δ[ὲ]ν; 
Z. 23: ἔτους → [(ἔτους)] δεκάτου.
Z. 18 und 24: Zahlmarkierung über den Tagesdaten.

 - Z. 11 [κα]ὶ̣ → [ὃ κα]ὶ̣ (das Relativpronomen ist wegen des Satzanschlusses erforderlich).
Die folgenden Vorschläge anhand der Abbildung im Internet:
Z. 12: οὐθὲ → οὐθὲν̣;
Z. 12/13: οὐ|[θὲ] → οὐ|[δὲ];
Z. 18: Ἐπὶφ → Ἐπεὶφ und Ἡρακλῆς ὁ καὶ → Ἡρακλᾶς ὃς καὶ;
Z. 21/22: οὐ|δὲ → οὐ|δ[ὲ]ν;
Z. 23: ἔτους → [(ἔτους)] δεκάτου.
Z. 18 und 24: Zahlmarkierung über den Tagesdaten.

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - AcceptText - Lin11 yes. Lin12 traces of a Nu are not really very clear, but it is clear that there has been a fold in the papyrus at this point. The space between the epsilon and epsilon is greater than one might expect. A closing Nu would be preferable especially in the light of the newly proposed Nu in lins21/22. Thus I think it better to accept the dotted Nu as a reading in the text. lin18 both new readings are clear and an improvement. Lin21/22 yes. δεκάτου with heavy Verschleifung is the better reading and the restored (ἔτους) would be required and there is space for it. (James Cowey)
 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept. See Cowey's. (Joshua D. Sosin)
 - Finalized - Ready. (James Cowey)