I can do that and I really couldn't make up my mind. I guess I wanted the
name to highlight that there might be some unexpected stuff because we are
adapting those interfaces to the way Input and Output work. But I might
have been just over thinking it.


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nathan Sweet <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In src/com/esotericsoftware/kryo/adapters/DataInputAdapter.java:
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> > +package com.esotericsoftware.kryo.adapters;
>
> Ok, I guess io is fine. Should we use the names
> KryoDataInput/KryoDataOutput to match KryoObjectInput/KryoObjectOutput?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/pull/167/files#r8710486>
> .
>