Roger's suggested changes to PR template

These are ideas Roger had for the template. I'll let him elaborate but I think the gist of it is that more people are checking against the Jira, and ensuring we're not blocked waiting for IPs to complete code review before merging.
It feels like by explicitly stating this, we're saying to IP's that their +1 is worthless. I'd prefer that people are vaguely aware that if no IP's are around to +1 then we can go ahead and merge (they probably won't notice, we could even just tick those boxes and pretend). The act of asking one of them to +1 a PR could help them feel more engaged in our bigger projects, feel like a real member of the team and it might result in them being more proactive?

What do others think?