cpufreq: interactive: delete timers for GOV_START

Make sure that timers cpu_timer and cpu_slack_timer
deactivated before addition of new.

Change-Id: If31c4049606871df6f00efdc24b1d713c86a6f69
Signed-off-by: Shridhar Rasal <srasal@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharat Nihalani <bnihalani@nvidia.com>
Git-commit: b430123367e78a6557bac3cf1558bcb85193fb12
Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/
[mattw@codeaurora.org: resolved trivial context conflict]
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Add cpu-boost driver

When certain bursty and important events take place, it might take a while
for the current cpufreq governor to notice the new load and react to it.
That would result in poor user experience. To alleviate this, the cpu-boost
driver boosts the frequency of a CPU for a short duration to maintain good
user experience while the governor catches up.

Specifically, this commit deals with ensuring that when "important" tasks
migrate from a fast CPU to a slow CPU, the frequency of the slow CPU is
boosted to be at least as high as the fast CPU for a short duration.

Since this driver enforces the boost by hooking into standard cpufreq
ADJUST notifiers, it has several advantages:
- More portable across kernel versions where the cpufreq internals might
  have been rewritten.
- Governor agnostic and hence works with multiple governors like
  conservative, ondemand, interactive, etc.
- Does not affect the sampling period/logic of existing governors.
- Can have the boost period adjusted independent of governor sampling
  period.

Change-Id: Ibd814a20043d0aba64ee7637a4a79b9ffa1b0991
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
	drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
cpufreq: Add a sync limit to cpu-boost

Perform frequency synchronization only when source CPU's frequency
is less than sync_threshold, else sync to the sync_threshold.

Change-Id: I544c414568d4e015b80ce5891dd215275bac95da
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Add Input Boost feature to the cpu-boost driver

On incoming input events boost the frequency of all online cpus
for at least input_boost_ms ms. This is accomplished by changing
the policy->min of all the online cpus to input_boost_freq.

Change-Id: Idb0ab75d68ae4ceff259cbbaaec1a9bb3bc871d3
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Resolve deadlock when waking up sync thread

CPU boost driver receives notification from scheduler when threads
migrate towards a cpu and in turn wakes up a sync thread associated
with that cpu to handle any required frequency transitions. The wakeup
call however can lead to a deadlock inside scheduler under some
circumstance. The deadlock is seen when sync thread is the only thread
running on a cpu and goes to sleep (say by calling wait_event() ->
schedule()). Midway through this sleep (schedule()) call, while cpu is
still running in context of sync thread, scheduler attempts a load
balance (realizing that cpu is about to become idle) which can result
in tasks being migrated towards the cpu going idle. This will cause
migration notification to be issued and in turn a wakeup on sync
thread. The wakeup call however gets stuck in below while() loop
inside scheduler:

try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, ...)
{

        /*
         * If the owning (remote) cpu is still in the middle of
	 * schedule() with this task as prev, wait until its done
	 * referencing the task.
         */
	while (p->on_cpu)
		cpu_relax();

}

A possible fix could be to teach try_to_wake_up() about this
special case. Another fix, implemented in this patch and that helps
minimize scheduler changes, is to have cpu boost driver not issue a
wakeup under this special circumstance, which was found to occur very
infrequently.

Change-Id: I92bc68a22d51595a208673fe2a1eedfa97004f9e
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Fix queue_delayed_work_on() race with hotplug

Calling queue_delayed_work_on() on a CPU that's in the process of getting
hotplugged out can result in that CPU infinitely looping in
msm_pm_wait_cpu_shutdown(). If queue_delayed_work_on() is called after the
CPU is hotplugged out, it could wake up the CPU without going through the
hotplug path and cause instability. To avoid this, make sure the CPU is and
stays online while queuing a work on it.

Change-Id: I1b4aae3db803e476b1a7676d08f495c1f38bb154
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Fix deadlock in wake_up of sync threads

If wake_up() is called on the current task on a CPU, the call will wait
until the current task is switched out before it wakes it up again and
returns.

The sync notifier for a CPU always runs on that CPU.

These two together can result in a deadlock if the sync notifier on CPU A
tries to wake up the sync thread of CPU A as it goes to sleep (is the
current task). A previous commit fixed this by adding a check to the sync
notifier to not wake up the sync thread of CPU A if it's the current task.

But this is still not sufficient to prevent deadlocks.

Sync thread of CPU A could be the current task on CPU B and sync thread of
CPU B could be the current task on CPU A.  At this point, if sync notifier
of CPU A and B try to wake up the sync threads of CPU A and B, it will
result in CPU A waiting for the current task in CPU B to get switched out
and CPU B waiting for the current task in CPU A to get switched out.  This
will result in a deadlock.

Prevent this scenario from happening by pinning the sync threads of each
CPU to run on that CPU. By doing this, we guarantee that sync notifiers
will only try to wake up sync threads running on that CPU. The fix added by
"cpufreq: cpu-boost: Resolve deadlock when waking up sync thread" ensures a
deadlock doesn't happen when a sync notifier tries to wake up a sync thread
running on that CPU.

Change-Id: I864e545529722a23886dd5a82f66089155d2d193
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Don't register for cpufreq notifiers too early

The cpufreq notifiers should be registered only after all the data
structures used in the notifier callbacks have been initialized. So, move
the cpufreq notifier registration to a later point in the init function.

Change-Id: I043ab5bc0ebb98164c40549fe151a8d801c8c186
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Re-issue boosts above minimum frequency

Frequency boosts where the source CPU frequency is greater than CPU's
minimum frequency should always go through regardless of the destination
CPU's current frequency. This fixes a performance issue where the governor
lowers the CPU frequency shortly after a thread is migrated to it because
the boost wasn't re-issued.

Change-Id: I449545a688d84b0a6e834f5a51dcb499caa84d29
Signed-off-by: Patrick Cain <pcain@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Sync on thread migration optimizations

When threads migrate between CPUs the destination CPU will temporarily
have a boosted frequency and the source CPU will have a residual higher
frequency even though the load could have just been reduced. To avoid
leaving CPUs at a high frequencies notify the source CPU after a thread
migration and make the interactive governor's timer reschedule
conditionally.

Change-Id: Id55055f2a116ca7ffd2a34dc3d0ec519c888a111
Signed-off-by: Patrick Cain <pcain@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Don't reset sampling down factor at max freq

A previous patch sets the min_sample_time to zero if the cpufreq
min/max limits have changed which would bring down the frequency
in the next sample even if min_sample_time doesnt allow it to do so.
This could severly affect benchmarks if this is applied to max
frequencies as min_sample_time for max frequencies is set to
sampling_down_factor.
This patch resets the limits_changed flag for cases where timer fires
while running at max frequencies so that sampling_down_factor is
still applicable as before.

Change-Id: I397133cb15eea4ab999d0f69617b4922438c6e11
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: fix compiling warnings

The gcc warns like:

  cpufreq_interactive.c:745:6: warning: operation on 'ret' may be
undefined [-Wsequence-point]

It was introduced by commit cf0fad49d17cb8273ce555dd5b7afab67d7923bf.

Since sprintf(...) just return 1 (one character) in this case, ret
should not changed.
Just discarding the result of sprintf(...) leads to the result that
the committer of cf0fad49d17cb8273ce555dd5b7afab67d7923bf wants.

Change-Id: Ifed1cef6d6a31c3ed23dad03a567b3b9eddf3a57
Signed-off-by: Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@android-x86.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Daynard <nardholio@gmail.com>
cpufreq: interactive: Move definition of cpufreq_gov_interactive downwards

This moves definition of cpufreq_gov_interactive towards the bottom of file, so
that we don't have to add prototype of cpufreq_governor_interactive() in the
beginning of file.

Change-Id: I04bd1004954eb36502c5cd7e35d3d7274cddaf95
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Git-commit: e50d640cacfe61e69f1b4fa92fa0174c688e919c
Git-Repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common.git
[junjiew@codeaurora.org: Resolve merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Junjie Wu <junjiew@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c