Great stuff used a noise loop in the Espirit matrix, found that high angle with small baseline is good, and low angle with large baseline is good. Will send to Dr. K and Confirm.
 added a polar file and copied and pasted the real exspirti into. Need to adjust to polar with out the interferometry
Worked with the full polar inter, Compared both plotting over low angles
Messing with the weights of the ground and veg, it seams that cum is better till a point then diverges hard which could be good becuase the ambiguity goes away you know its wrong
More Stuff
 Creating a SNR x axis and now looking at the error in degrees plot. Also added the magnitude plot to the mix. Doesnt really tell to much
Worked on the baseline espirit added the error SNR plot. Noticed it doesnt work with threee elements on the baseline. The second will go to zero
Yep yep got it to work, the problem was in the sorting routine of the baseline stuff, Looks like we are good to go
Gotta Ask Dr. K some things
Wow I think we had a break through. We determined the more rows that you add to S1 and S2 the better the data. More rows of the same data.
Finished Polar Multi row and great results almost the same as cumulant, also created cumulant multi row.....Really god results
Not sure
Adjusted the sorting routine to sort using degrees. This is done beause matlab truncates so when using radians you only have 0 - 3.14.... but with degres we have 0 - 360. Less error orcurs from truncating