sched/fair: Fix typo describing flags in enqueue_entity

Fix spelling of 'calling' in description of se flags in
enqueue_entity().

Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched: Fix __sched_period comment

It should be sched_nr_latency so fix it before it annoys me more.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched: Update documentation and comments

Change sched_*.c to sched/*.c in documentation and comments.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
 cpufreq: interactive: Add check_fast mode to raise freqs faster

It takes too long to scale from min_freq to max_freq. If you ignore
go_hispeed, then it takes over 100ms to step up through all the
frequencies. Even with go_hispeed, I think I figured it was 90ms to go
from idle to max speed.

The core of the problem is that a cpu_load << 100% is meaningful for
scaling.  As that load approaches 100% though, this estimate becomes
meaningless.

Here "meaningful" means that the speed adjusted load is a good approximation
of the total processing work needed and therefore good for estimating the
target frequency.

At 100% it is not meaningful because either it is a perfect estimate (had
we been running faster there is no more work we would have done) or off by
a factor of max_freq/min_freq in the worst case.

This patch recognizes this case and scales more aggressively.  At the same
time it also re-estimates in a shorter time to correct over/under scaling.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
 cpufreq: interactive: Disable idle notifier

Instead, just always poll using the timer.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>