Studio/uses mixed modulestore

https://edx-wiki.atlassian.net/browse/STUD-1540

**MixedModuleStore API**
* Updated Studio and LMS so all callers, with a few exceptions, go through the `MixedModulestore`.
  * to find the exceptions (a few tests and 2 management commands), search for callers to `_get_modulestore_by_type`.
* Updated the `MixedModuleStore` API and all their callers to take in the `user_id` for all Edit operations.

**Mongo Modulestore**
* Callers should no longer distinguish between 'direct' and 'draft' Mongo modulestores.  All users of the Mongo store now always go through the `DraftModuleStore`.
* Callers can specify whether they want only published versions in their runtime by configuring the modulestore's branch to 'published' (LMS).  The default setting is 'draft' (used by CMS and Preview) which prefers Draft versions over Published versions.
* API changes:
  * Updated APIs for `has_item`, `get_parent_locations`, `get_items`, and `delete_item` to take in a `revision` parameter.  Refer to docstrings for more detail.
* Improvements to the implementation of the following APIs:
  * Publish - so it automatically publishes all the downstream children.
  * Delete - so it does the "right" thing depending on which revision is deleted, etc.


**Settings**
* Changed the configuration setting format so the Stores listed in the Mixed configuration can be ordered by preference, via a `list` rather than a `dict`.
* Updated the settings for all Test code so they should all go through Mixed, unless they are explicitly testing a particular store.
* Introduced a new Setting called `MODULESTORE_BRANCH` that specifies the default "branch" (draft or published) to be used by relevant modulestore methods.  Currently, the `DraftModuleStore` uses this setting.  Eventually, the `SplitModuleStore` will also honor it.

**Tests**
* Since (most) test code now go through the Draft store, some tests needed to be updated to Publish their newly created items if they assumed they would be in that state.

**Reviewers**: @cahrens (Studio) @dianakhuang (LMS) @feanil (Devops)

I'm not sure this command has any on-going value. We needed it to fix a problem but then coded defensively to prevent it from occurring again. Is the cost of maintaining this code worth keeping it?