Add an introduction paragraph to the travis post.

These last two sentences are an awkward read; they seem like disconnected thoughts. Also, the peer review sentence is kind of a gloss-over. It may be easy to see what tests are added, but it's not necessarily easy to determine the correctness or completeness. It's kind of a topic in and of itself. 

If you take a step back, I think you have an opportunity here to break this into more focused topics that would create a more coherent story.
- peer review process
- automated testing (completeness, correctness, etc)
- continuous integration as a concept and process 
- travis vs jenkins