OK, I'll try to move it and see what the tests say. You're right, it does
make more sense being around the exe code rather than the alias code.
On Mar 4, 2014 9:10 PM, "Moshe Weitzman" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In includes/command.inc:
>
> > @@ -1856,6 +1856,16 @@ function drush_enforce_requirement_core(&$command) {
> >  function drush_shell_alias_replace() {
> >    $args = drush_get_arguments();
> >    $argv = drush_get_context('argv');
> > +  // Normally we want the coverage argument to get passed along, but this is one
>
> But this code only applies to shell aliases if the change is indeed in
> drush_shell_alias_replace(). Odd that you only want to affect shell alias
> requests.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/drush-ops/drush/pull/403/files#r10272330>
> .
>