Switch `<>` back to `[]`

Here we go.

Thoughts?
By what criteria are you claiming that this "composes **much** better"? It's literally the the same number of symbols, arranged in the same fashion, with the same basic properties (balanced pairs of some form of bracket), with the only only difference being one uses square brackets and one uses angle brackets.

You seem to be taking it as a given that what you've stated is true, but without providing any evidence whatsoever, I'm unconvinced that this provides a readability benefit.