(SERVER-153) Separate unit tests from integration tests

This commit is just some preparation for some larger forthcoming
changes.

The idea is that there are some things that we can start testing
in pure clojure that are more at the integration level than the
unit level.  e.g., we can start doing some tests around catalog
requests based on manifests and other files on disk.

This kind of testing should be *significantly* less expensive
(both in terms of development / maintenance and in terms of
execution times) than the existing beaker-style acceptance tests,
but significantly *more* expensive than what you might normally
think of as a clojure unit test.

Using lein's `test-selectors` feature, it is possible to flag
some tests as 'unit' tests and some tests as 'integration' tests.
This commit is a first step towards breaking up our tests into
two groups like this.  It does the following:

* Change our `test-paths` setting from the default (`["test"]`) to
  explicitly specify separate directories for unit/integration:
  `["test/unit", "test/integration"]`.

* Move all existing tests to `unit`, except for the `bootstrap` test,
  which is moved to `integration` (in preparation for fleshing it
  out a bit further in a subsequent commit.)

* Set up the default test profile (e.g., what happens when you run
  `lein test`) to be ':unit'.  Integration tests can be run in
  isolation via `lein test :integration`, and all tests can be run
  in a single run via `lein test :all`.

* Update travis script to run `:all`.
I chose the default based on what I thought would be the most common use-case for devs; we can discuss whether or not that is the correct choice if you'd like.

The `:all` selector is built-in; if you run `lein help test`, the output includes this sentence:

    A default :all test-selector is available to run all tests.

I just ran `lein test :all` on tk-j9 and it works fine.

I stole these selectors directly from pe-rbac:

https://github.com/puppetlabs/pe-rbac-service/blob/18649048402346601ce8f4571f8e30782074b7b4/project.clj#L92-L95

So, was attempting to follow their convention.  I don't disagree with you about discussion/docs though.