[SPARK-2706][SQL] Enable Spark to support Hive 0.13

Given that a lot of users are trying to use hive 0.13 in spark, and the incompatibility between hive-0.12 and hive-0.13 on the API level I want to propose following approach, which has no or minimum impact on existing hive-0.12 support, but be able to jumpstart the development of hive-0.13 and future version support.

Approach: Introduce “hive-version” property,  and manipulate pom.xml files to support different hive version at compiling time through shim layer, e.g., hive-0.12.0 and hive-0.13.1. More specifically,

1. For each different hive version, there is a very light layer of shim code to handle API differences, sitting in sql/hive/hive-version, e.g., sql/hive/v0.12.0 or sql/hive/v0.13.1

2. Add a new profile hive-default active by default, which picks up all existing configuration and hive-0.12.0 shim (v0.12.0)  if no hive.version is specified.

3. If user specifies different version (currently only 0.13.1 by -Dhive.version = 0.13.1), hive-versions profile will be activated, which pick up hive-version specific shim layer and configuration, mainly the hive jars and hive-version shim, e.g., v0.13.1.

4. With this approach, nothing is changed with current hive-0.12 support.

No change by default: sbt/sbt -Phive
For example: sbt/sbt -Phive -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.4 -Dhadoop.version=2.4.0 assembly

To enable hive-0.13: sbt/sbt -Dhive.version=0.13.1 
For example: sbt/sbt -Dhive.version=0.13.1 -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.4 -Dhadoop.version=2.4.0 assembly

Note that in hive-0.13, hive-thriftserver is not enabled, which should be fixed by other Jira, and we don’t need -Phive with -Dhive.version in building (probably we should use -Phive -Dhive.version=xxx instead after thrift server is also supported in hive-0.13.1).
Here ```r``` maybe a ```Array``` type(https://github.com/scwf/hive/blob/branch-0.13/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/FetchFormatter.java#L53-L64), we should cover that case, otherwise this will lead to console result printed as follows:
``` result
   [Object@5e41108b
```
   
And on the other hand i suggest that we should do some tests with this PR merged with #2685 to check the basic functionality