ARM: 7674/1: smp: Avoid dummy clockevent being preferred over real hardware clock-event

With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer subsystem. And since
the rating of the dummy clock event is very high, it may be preferred
over a real clock event.

This is a change in behavior from past and not an intended one. So
reduce the rating of the dummy clock-event so that real clock-event
device is selected when available.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>
ARM: 7685/1: delay: use private ticks_per_jiffy field for timer-based delay ops

Commit 70264367a243 ("ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when
using a constant delay clock") fixed a problem with our timer-based
delay loop, where loops_per_jiffy is scaled by cpufreq yet used directly
by the timer delay ops.

This patch fixes the problem in a more elegant way by keeping a private
ticks_per_jiffy field in the delay ops, independent of loops_per_jiffy
and therefore not subject to scaling. The loop-based delay continues to
use loops_per_jiffy directly, as it should.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>
ARM: smp: flush L1 cache in cpu_die()

Flush the L1 cache for the CPU which is going down in cpu_die() so
that we don't end up with all platforms doing this.  This ensures
that any cache lines we own are pushed out before the cache becomes
inaccessible.

We may end up subsequently creating some dirty cache lines - for
example, with the complete() call, but this update must become
visible to other CPUs before __cpu_die() can proceed.  Subsequent
accesses from the platforms cpu_die() function should _not_ matter.

Also place a mb() after the complete() call to ensure that this is
visible to other CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>
sched: core: sched_mc_power_savings = 0

Back to square one. For some time, enabling this was optimal on this kernel;
with recent updates, not so much. Sched can handle this well on its own.

Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>