I am mostly neutral on that front. If object() is acceptable I’m okay with that. I pushed a commit that changes it to object :)  


On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Alex Stapleton wrote:

> In cryptography/hazmat/primitives/asymmetric/padding.py:
> > @@ -20,3 +24,22 @@ > @utils.register_interface(interfaces.AsymmetricPadding) > class PKCS1v15(object): > name = "EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5" > + > + > +class MGF1(object): > + MAX_LENGTH = collections.namedtuple("MAX_LENGTH", [])()  
> I suggested that but I think @reaperhulk (https://github.com/reaperhulk) chose this because it has the minor advantage of str(MAX_LENGTH) being "MAX_LENGTH()" which is a bit better than "''".
>  
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/775/files#r10616232).
>  
>  
>