[MRG+1] Clustering algorithm - BIRCH 

Fixes https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/2690

The design is similar to the Java code written here https://code.google.com/p/jbirch/
I am pretty much sure it works (If the JAVA implementation is correct, ofc), since I get the same clusters for both cases. I opened this as a Proof of Concept.

This example has been modified, http://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/cluster/plot_mini_batch_kmeans.html
 
When `threshold` is set to 3.0

![figure_1](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1867024/4772737/1dd8604a-5b9b-11e4-800d-aea031410a30.png)

When `threshold` is set to 1.0

![figure_2](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1867024/4772748/2e46daec-5b9b-11e4-8f49-672b0ada17b7.png)

TODO: A LOT

- [x] Make it as fast as possible.
- [x] Support for sparse matrices.
- [x] Extensive testing.
- [x] Make the common tests pass, for now I have added it to `dont_test` ;)
- [x] Narrative documentation

Awating some initial feedback!

 
Sorry for the usage of "entire dataset". My point is don't you think that doing pairwise distances is a bit computationally expensive (given the fact that much has been done to speed up the bottlenecks)?
DBSCAN just sets it as 0.5, "The maximum distance between two samples for them to be considered as in the same neighborhood." The Java code also sets it as 0.5. (I don't know why I set it to 1.0 though). I believe it is slightly a bit too intelligent (and expensive) to identify a good threshold internally, when the user could just set it himself.