cpufreq: interactive: Add a sampling_down_factor for max frequencies

Change min_sample_time to 100ms when running at max

Change-Id: Ia7e35b0625bedf20e7ef3a1f52e5828ffbfed93e
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
cpufreq: interactive: Allow 1 ms error in above_hispeed_delay comparisons

Allow for an error of 1 ms while taking into account
above_hispeed_delay for a frequency

Change-Id: I744e44387152e4efb5978df4f2b9533bf79d4582
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: sync freq feature for interactive governor

1) Add load info to cpufreq_interactive_cpuinfo
2) If load on any other online cpu exceeds sync_freq_load_threshold,
   do not allow the frequency to drop below sync_freq

Change-Id: I3617e10f87b85178914a18bcf04ac2a31a4f1ec1
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Reset floor_validate_time if busy at max for 100ms

When the interactive governor selects to run at max frequency it doesn't
re-schedule the timer until it hits an idle. This change checks if the CPU
has been continuously busy for last 100ms on hitting an idle start. If yes,
then floor_validate_time is reset so that the CPU stays at max frequency
for at least another 100 ms before stepping down.
This is an important feature for detecting CPU intensive workloads which
require high frequencies for achieving better performance.

Change-Id: I7d48ffbc3d50a80af9be3bf94667ee3d0120b763
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Remove trace event from idle_start handler

Removed the trace_cpufreq_interactive_idle_start.
Also fix a crash resulting from accessing NULL policy before taking
the pcpu->enable_sem lock. The policy can be NULL if the core is
hotplugged out before the enable_sem lock is taken.

Change-Id: I7e2809cc016b3b383a44cdf3c697013e2d2b5417
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Modifying sync_freq implementation

1. Check for up_threshold_any_cpu_freq instead of sync_freq to
   boost the frequency to sync_freq.
2. Change the load threshold name from sync_freq_load_threshold to
   up_threshold_any_cpu_load
3. Do not consider CPUs with load less than up_threshold_any_cpu_load
   while evaluating max load across CPUs

Change-Id: Ia0e537edbf38a5006c1a22f5c472daa0d086ffc9
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Use default min_sample_time if SDF is zero

Use min_sample_time to step down from max frequencies if
sampling_down_factor is set to zero.

Change-Id: I2e89bef6220557cb95efd20d658e0c05753b4c3c
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Fix null pointer dereference in interactive governor

For the sync_freq feature currently we check pcpu->policy->cur frequency
for each online cpu.  But for a CPU that isn't using interactive governor
or for an offline CPU, pcpu->policy can be null or an invalid value.
This patch tries to avoid that scenario by using pcpu->target_freq
instead of policy->cur to get the frequency of an online CPU.

Kernel crash without this patch:
[   20.132373] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000028
[   20.132375] pgd = c34f34c0
[   20.132377] pgd = ef6f2440
[   20.132383] [00000028] *pgd=00000000
[   20.132385]
[   20.132388] [00000028] *pgd=2e98f003, *pmd=00000000
[   20.132390] Internal error: Oops: 205 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
[   20.132394] Modules linked in:
[   20.132398] CPU: 0 PID: 1560 Comm: chown Tainted: G        W    3.10.0-perf-gb12057b-00001-ga2c6c16-dirty #7
[   20.132401] task: ef9af300 ti: ee49c000 task.ti: ee49c000
[   20.132411] PC is at cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x10c/0x650
[   20.132415] LR is at cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x128/0x650
<snip>
[   20.133002] [<c07eb204>] (cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x10c/0x650) from [<c02804d8>] (call_timer_fn+0x80/0x198)
[   20.133012] [<c02804d8>] (call_timer_fn+0x80/0x198) from [<c0280acc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x1f8/0x270)
[   20.133019] [<c0280acc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x1f8/0x270) from [<c0279e20>] (__do_softirq+0x12c/0x2d4)
[   20.133025] [<c0279e20>] (__do_softirq+0x12c/0x2d4) from [<c027a2d4>] (irq_exit+0x74/0xc8)
[   20.133034] [<c027a2d4>] (irq_exit+0x74/0xc8) from [<c0206a00>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c)
[   20.133041] [<c0206a00>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c) from [<c02004b8>] (gic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x60)
[   20.133051] [<c02004b8>] (gic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x60) from [<c0ac6900>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70)
<snip>

Change-Id: Ie834f5d383de4d41e0fe6fbd40c8b0a0c05d82f5
Signed-off-by: Vijay Ganti <viganti@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: delete timers for GOV_START

Make sure that timers cpu_timer and cpu_slack_timer
deactivated before addition of new.

Change-Id: If31c4049606871df6f00efdc24b1d713c86a6f69
Signed-off-by: Shridhar Rasal <srasal@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharat Nihalani <bnihalani@nvidia.com>
Git-commit: b430123367e78a6557bac3cf1558bcb85193fb12
Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/
[mattw@codeaurora.org: resolved trivial context conflict]
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Add check_fast mode to raise freqs faster

It takes too long to scale from min_freq to max_freq. If you ignore
go_hispeed, then it takes over 100ms to step up through all the
frequencies. Even with go_hispeed, I think I figured it was 90ms to go
from idle to max speed.

The core of the problem is that a cpu_load << 100% is meaningful for
scaling.  As that load approaches 100% though, this estimate becomes
meaningless.

Here "meaningful" means that the speed adjusted load is a good approximation
of the total processing work needed and therefore good for estimating the
target frequency.

At 100% it is not meaningful because either it is a perfect estimate (had
we been running faster there is no more work we would have done) or off by
a factor of max_freq/min_freq in the worst case.

This patch recognizes this case and scales more aggressively.  At the same
time it also re-estimates in a shorter time to correct over/under scaling.

Change-Id: I0b199f3aa9f451cf500ec3c73ef3352f1661b0c0

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
cpufreq: Use dedicated high-priority workqueues

In the process of scaling CPU frequencies, cpufreq and the APIS is
calls may hold resources that will prevent threads critical for
system stability from running.

Specifically, thermal-mitigation software may need to respond
quickly to high-temperature conditions and throttle the CPU speed
in an effort to cool down. If the system is already in the middle
of a CPU frequency switch being executed on behalf of a cpufreq
governor, thermal mitigation will be blocked until the scaling
action has completed. If the system is under heave load of medium
or high-priority threads, this may take a long while and the system
may potentially surpass thermal limits in the meantime.

Resolve this by using high priority workqueues for all ondemand
and conservative governor scaling operations.  This will allow them
to complete promptly and release their hold on resources necessary
for maintaining system stability.

Change-Id: I2f56052c131442838036cf4cdd8059f7c09bb805
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
i9500: update config
i9500: Enable /proc/sysrq-trigger
cpufreq: interactive: add missing declaration