I wonder if we should call constructor tests differently to be more clear and also to differentiate from the Create method, which this class has. What do you guys think of using the following pattern: (DefaultConstructor|ConstructorWith[a-z]+(And[a-z]+)*)Succeeds

That would give us:
DefaultConstructorSucceeds()
ConstructorWithNameSucceeds()
ConstructorWithNameAndDescriptionSucceeds()

Perhaps there's a better word than "Succeeds" too.