msm8974: Adapt memutils optimizations from msm8960pro

Preload farther to take advantage of the memory bus, and assume
64-byte cache lines.  Unroll some pairs of ldm/stm as well, for
unexplainable reasons.

Future enhancements should include,

- #define for how far to preload, possibly defined separately for
  memcpy, copy_*_user
- Tuning for misaligned buffers
- Tuning for memmove
- Tuning for small buffers
- Understanding mechanism behind ldm/stm unroll causing some gains
  in copy_to_user

BASELINE (msm8960pro):
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 808850 usec, bandwidth 1236.236 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 810071 usec, bandwidth 1234.234 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 942926 usec, bandwidth 1060.060 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 848588 usec, bandwidth 1178.178 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 847916 usec, bandwidth 1179.179 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 935113 usec, bandwidth 1069.069 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 779459 usec, bandwidth 1282.282 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 346223 usec, bandwidth 2888.888 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 348084 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 348176 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 348267 usec, bandwidth 2871.871 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 377018 usec, bandwidth 2652.652 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 371829 usec, bandwidth 2689.689 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 383763 usec, bandwidth 2605.605 MB/s

Change-Id: I105bd5f5b9ea397891dec28a272bde1591bdd701
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>

Conflicts:

	arch/arm/configs/faux_hammerhead_defconfig
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
 Update ARM topology and add cpu_power driver

Conflicts:

	drivers/staging/Kconfig
Enable arch_power
sched: set sched_mc_power_savings to 2, which is the highest power saving possible value for this tunable. Basically according to http://elinux.org/images/1/1d/Comparing_Power_Saving_Techniques_For_Multicore_ARM_Platforms.pdf this tunable provides serious power saving improvements close to the power savings of hotpluging cores. Since in this Kernel we're using always a minimum of 2 cpus online at any time during screen off we might actually benefit from this because this feature packs tasks together and try to bind them to cpu0, which in theory will let cpu1 idle longer, thus improving battery life.

Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
blank removed