Hmm I was thinking the opposite haha.  I figured it would be easier to
retain just the ID number, and then format the number as needed in code.
 Any one else have tie-braking thoughts?


On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, teravest <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In www/select_study_task.psp:
>
> > @@ -327,6 +329,13 @@ elif ebi_study_accession is not None:
> >
> >  # End indent
> >  # End if
> > +if vamps_id is not None:
> > +    # Indent
> > +%>
> > +        <li>
> > +            <a href="http://vamps.mbl.edu/portals/mobedac/mobedac_cv.php?project=<%=vamps_id%>" target="_blank">View Study at VAMPS</a>
>
> I thought if the MBE every changes in the future it would be easier to
> have the database have MBE_####
> … <#1436927c8d480395_>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:56 PM, adamrp <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> In www/select_study_task.psp: > @@ -327,6 +329,13 @@ elif
> ebi_study_accession is not None: > > # End indent > # End if > +if vamps_id
> is not None: > + # Indent > +%> > + <li> > + <a href="
> http://vamps.mbl.edu/portals/mobedac/mobedac_cv.php?project=<%=vamps_id%>"
> target="_blank">View Study at VAMPS</a> Are we going to record vamps_id in
> the database as "MBE_####" or just record the ####? The formatting of this
> link depends on how we store that information. — Reply to this email
> directly or view it on GitHub<
> https://github.com/qiime/qiime_web_app/pull/564/files#r8675452> .
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/qiime/qiime_web_app/pull/564/files#r8675670>
> .
>