Adding more reasons, removing one.

How do you interpret this sentence? Is it: "servers MAY accept to negotiate SSLv3 with clients that only offer SSLv3"; or "servers MUST accepts clients that propose SSLv3 or higher, but MUST NOT negotiate SSLv3 in this case" ?
I think the first interpretation defeats a bit the goal of this document; while the second may be a useful clarification, yet a bit duplicating the "Negotiation of SSLv3 MUST NOT be permitted" sentence.