Trying to increase coverage for some By equivalence methods.  I am not crazy about the naming schemes though.

Trying to increase some unit test coverage for equals methods and hash code methods.
Thanks again! My suggestion here would be to use more descriptive names; instead of sequential, name them by what they are. If there are truly two of the same thing, I like to use more readable words like "another" or "additional" etc.

Ex:
```java
Locator byIdTest = By.id("test");
Locator anotherByIdTest = By.id("test");
Locator byIdBlah = By.id("blah");
```

Then your assertions become more readable (and you are not left having to look up to see why `locatorOne` should be equal to `locatorThree`). Perhaps somewhat moot in this simple of a test, but hey every little bit of readability helps.

Thanks again!