Paper: Frequentism and Bayesianism: A Python-driven Primer (Jake VanderPlas)

This is the final version – ready to be reviewed.
@jakevdp   As I said before I think the paper is pretty good. The paper can be "unfair", but the problem is if you try to "oversell" it as "Bayesianism versus Frequentism". In that case you are open to "unfairness" criticism and you need to write a short book and not 8 pages, or at least use "realistic" examples.

For my taste there are enough qualifiers in the paper that it doesn't sound like it wants to be the ultimate answer to the centuries of Bayesian versus Frequentist debate :)