rustc: Run destructors when dest=Ignore

Previously, if statements of the form "Foo;" or "let _ = Foo;" were encountered
where Foo had a destructor, the destructors were not run. This changes
the relevant locations in trans to check for ty::type_needs_drop and invokes
trans_to_lvalue instead of trans_into.

Closes #4734
Closes #6892
rustc: Remove f{32,64} % from the language

This commit removes the compiler support for floating point modulus operations,
as well as from the language. An implementation for this operator is now
required to be provided by libraries.

Floating point modulus is rarely used, doesn't exist in C, and is always lowered
to an fmod library call by LLVM, and LLVM is considering removing support
entirely.

Closes #12278
rust-mode cleanup.

* Use `setq-local' instead of (set (make-local-variable ...) value).
  Provides a version for older Emacsen.
* Remove use of `cl.el'.
* Use \' in file regexp instead of line end match $.
* Use type for defcustom and add parent group.
Collect move errors before reporting

This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,

```rust
enum Foo {
    Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
    Foo2(~u32),
    Foo3,
}

fn main() {
    let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
    match *f {
        Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
        Foo2(num) => (),
        Foo3 => ()
    }
}
```

Errors before the change:

```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10         Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10         Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11         Foo2(num) => (),
                   ^~~~~~~~~
```

After:

```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9     match *f {
                    ^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, you can use `ref num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10         Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
                        ^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2`)
test.rs:10         Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
                              ^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num`)
test.rs:11         Foo2(num) => (),
                        ^~~
```

Close #8064
doc: Add "A 30-minute Introduction to Rust"

By Steve Klabnik.
doc: Edit intro
Check bounds when looking up type parameters

A mismatched type with more type parameters than the expected one causes
`typeck` looking up out of the bound of type parameter vector, which
leads to ICE.

Closes #13466
Append missing padding after last field of struct

This patch fixes issue #13186.

When generating constant expression for enum, it is possible that
alignment of expression may be not equal to alignment of type.  In that
case space after last struct field must be padded to match size of value
and size of struct. This commit adds that padding.

See detailed explanation in src/test/run-pass/trans-tag-static-padding.rs
Tweaked the design to be a lot cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Fagnan <dnfagnan@gmail.com>
fixed issues

Signed-off-by: Daniel Fagnan <dnfagnan@gmail.com>
doc: design changes cleanups

Conflicts:
	src/librustdoc/html/layout.rs
rustc: Don't link in syntax extensions

This bug was introduced in #13384 by accident, and this commit continues the
work of #13384 by finishing support for loading a syntax extension crate without
registering it with the local cstore.

Closes #13495
Replace 'region' with 'lifetime' in a few transmute function names
rustdoc: Use smaller sequential numbers instead of `NodeId`s for parents.

`allPaths` is now a flat array in effect. This decreases the size of
the search index by about 4--5% (gzipped or not).
rustdoc: Represent item types as a small number in the search index.

Has negligible improvements with gzip, but saves about 7% without it.
This also has an effect of changing the tie-breaking order of item types.
rustdoc: Use an array instead of an object for the search index.

`buildIndex` JS function recovers them into the original object form.
This greatly reduces the size of the uncompressed search index (27%),
while this effect is less visible after gzipped (~5%).
rustdoc: Get rid of `allPaths` global variable by merging it into `searchIndex`.
rustdoc: Omit repeated paths in the search index.

Since the items roughly follow the lexical order, there are
many consecutive items with the same path value which can be
easily compressed.

For the library and compiler docs, this commit decreases
the index size by 26% and 6% before and after gzip, respectively.
Use new attribute syntax in python files in src/etc too (#13478)
auto merge of #13431 : lifthrasiir/rust/rustdoc-smaller-index, r=alexcrichton

This is a series of inter-related commits which depend on #13402 (Prune the paths that do not appear in the index). Please consider this as an early review request; I'll rebase this when the parent PR get merged and rebase is required.

----

This PR aims at reducing the search index without removing the actual information. In my measurement with both library and compiler docs, the search index is 52% smaller before gzipped, and 16% smaller after gzipped:

```
 1719473 search-index-old.js
 1503299 search-index.js (after #13402, 13% gain)
  724955 search-index-new.js (after this PR, 52% gain w.r.t. #13402)

  262711 search-index-old.js.gz
  214205 search-index.js.gz (after #13402, 18.5% gain)
  179396 search-index-new.js.gz (after this PR, 16% gain w.r.t. #13402)
```

Both the uncompressed and compressed size of the search index have been accounted. While the former would be less relevant when #12597 (Web site should be transferring data compressed) is resolved, the uncompressed index will be around for a while anyway and directly affects the UX of docs. Moreover, LZ77 (and gzip) can only remove *some* repeated strings (since its search window is limited in size), so optimizing for the uncompressed size often has a positive effect on the compressed size as well.

Each commit represents the following incremental improvements, in the order:

1. Parent paths were referred by its AST `NodeId`, which tends to be large. We don't need the actual node ID, so we remap them to the smaller sequential numbers. This also means that the list of paths can be a flat array instead of an object.
2. We remap each item type to small predefined numbers. This is strictly intended to reduce the uncompressed size of the search index.
3. We use arrays instead of objects and reconstruct the original objects in the JavaScript code. Since this removes a lot of boilerplates, this affects both the uncompressed and compressed size.
4. (I've found that a centralized `searchIndex` is easier to handle in JS, so I shot one global variable down.)
5. Finally, the repeated paths in the consecutive items are omitted (replaced by an empty string). This also greatly affects both the uncompressed and compressed size.

There had been several unsuccessful attempts to reduce the search index. Especially, I explicitly avoided complex optimizations like encoding paths in a compressed form, and only applied the optimizations when it had a substantial gain compared to the changes. Also, while I've tried to be careful, the lack of proper (non-smoke) tests makes me a bit worry; any advice on testing the search indices would be appreciated.